Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Kubernetes Ingress Controllers

kgateway vs LiteSpeed Ingress Controller

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score kgateway #6 in Kubernetes Ingress Controllers 8.8/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 5 of 5 features Visit kgateway
LiteSpeed Ingress Controller #14 in Kubernetes Ingress Controllers 8.0/10 15-day trial Free trial✓ 5 of 5 features Visit LiteSpeed

kgateway leads on 1 check, LiteSpeed Ingress Controller on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scorekgateway · 8.8/10
  • Free planonly kgateway
  • Free trialonly LiteSpeed Ingress Controller

kgateway scores higher on our rubric for kubernetes ingress controllers: 8.8 against 8.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #6 and #14.

kgateway offers free plan; LiteSpeed Ingress Controller doesn't.

kgateway is the better fit for gateway API teams needing security controls. LiteSpeed Ingress Controller is the better fit for paid teams wanting comprehensive ingress controls.

  • kgateway fits best

    Gateway API teams needing security controls

  • LiteSpeed Ingress Controller fits best

    Paid teams wanting comprehensive ingress controls

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature kgateway 8.8/10 Visit ↗ LiteSpeed Ingress Controller 8.0/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.8 8.0
Ranking #6 in Kubernetes Ingress Controllers #14 in Kubernetes Ingress Controllers
Best for Gateway API teams needing security controls Paid teams wanting comprehensive ingress controls
Pricing model Free Paid
Starting price Free plan $715/yr
Free plan ✓ (best) —
Free trial — 15 days
Deployment Self-hosted Self-hosted, Cloud
Support Community, Docs Email, Tickets, Community, Docs
Integrations 4 integrations 4 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features kgateway 5/5 · LiteSpeed Ingress Controller 5/5
TLS automation ✓ ✓
Canary routing ✓ ✓
Rate limiting ✓ ✓
Web application firewall ✓ ✓
Auth policies ✓ ✓
Specs
Ingress API model Both Both
Deployment model Self-hosted Self-hosted
Our review
Pros
  • Free open-source Gateway API implementation
  • Weighted routing, canary splitting, and rate limiting
  • Authentication, TLS automation, and WAF support
  • Supports both Kubernetes Ingress resources and Gateway API resources
  • Combines TLS automation, canary routing, WAF, throttling, and authentication
  • Handles HTTP/2, HTTP/3, QUIC, and Kubernetes service load balancing
Cons
  • Self-hosted deployment requires a Kubernetes environment
  • Integration coverage centers on a focused set of platforms
  • No AI features are included
  • No permanent free plan is available
  • Requires a self-hosted deployment on Linux
  • Uses a licensed Web ADC engine rather than an open-source model
Our verdict

kgateway is an open-source Kubernetes-native ingress controller and API gateway for teams managing service, API, serverless, or legacy application traffic in Kubernetes. It implements the Kubernetes Gateway API and uses Envoy as its proxy…

Read the review →

LiteSpeed Ingress Controller is a self-hosted Kubernetes application delivery controller and load balancer built on the LiteSpeed Web ADC engine. It is intended for teams running Kubernetes infrastructure that need licensed ingress…

Read the review →
  1. kgatewayKubernetes Ingress Controllers 8.8Free plan
  2. LiteSpeed Ingress ControllerKubernetes Ingress Controllers 8.015-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • kgateway — where it wins

    • Free open-source Gateway API implementation
    • Weighted routing, canary splitting, and rate limiting
    • Authentication, TLS automation, and WAF support

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosted deployment requires a Kubernetes environment
    • Integration coverage centers on a focused set of platforms
    • No AI features are included
  • LiteSpeed Ingress Controller — where it wins

    • Supports both Kubernetes Ingress resources and Gateway API resources
    • Combines TLS automation, canary routing, WAF, throttling, and authentication
    • Handles HTTP/2, HTTP/3, QUIC, and Kubernetes service load balancing

    Where it doesn't

    • No permanent free plan is available
    • Requires a self-hosted deployment on Linux
    • Uses a licensed Web ADC engine rather than an open-source model
  • kgateway8.8/10 · Free plan

    A focused open-source Gateway API gateway for teams needing routing, security, and traffic controls.

    Visit kgatewayFull verdict →
  • LiteSpeed Ingress Controller8.0/10 · 15-day trial

    A paid, self-hosted controller with broad Kubernetes traffic, security, and protocol controls.

    Visit LiteSpeedFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update