Keycloak vs Ory

Keycloak9.4Visit Ory8.8Visit

Higher score Keycloak #1 in OAuth Server Software 9.4/10 Open source ✓ 0 of 5 features Visit Keycloak

vs

Ory #6 in OAuth Server Software 8.8/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 5 features Visit Ory

• Keycloak fits best

  Broad self-hosted identity deployments

• Ory fits best

  Managed or self-hosted identity platforms

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature	Keycloak 9.4/10 Visit ↗	Ory 8.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	9.4	8.8
Ranking	#1 in OAuth Server Software	#6 in OAuth Server Software
Best for	Broad self-hosted identity deployments	Managed or self-hosted identity platforms
Pricing model	Free	Free plan + paid
Starting price	Open source	—
Free plan	Not checked yet	✓ (best)
Free trial	—	—
Deployment	Cloud, Desktop, Self-hosted	Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms	Web, Windows, Linux	Web
Integrations	10 integrations	9 integrations
Features Keycloak 0/5 · Ory 0/5
OpenID Connect	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
SAML support	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Self-hosting	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Token introspection	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Machine-to-machine auth	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment model	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Our review
Pros	Supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0, and SAML 2.0 Combines SSO, federation, MFA, and fine-grained authorization Runs with VMs, containers, Kubernetes, and OpenShift	OAuth 2.0, OIDC, SAML SSO, MFA, and SCIM in one stack Supports managed cloud, self-hosted, web, API, and embedded deployments Fine-grained authorization, adaptive access, and machine-to-machine tokens
Cons	Organizations must deploy and manage the server themselves SCIM support is preview functionality SCIM is disabled by default	Growth pricing is listed at $9,350 annually Environment-based plans require careful capacity planning Enterprise capabilities are split across multiple deployment options
Our verdict	Keycloak is an open-source identity and access management server for web applications, REST services, and other applications. It suits organizations that want to operate their own authentication layer across multiple services and… Read the review →	Ory is an identity and access management platform for customer-facing applications, B2B SaaS products, partners, machines, and AI agents. It combines user identity profiles, passwordless and passkey authentication, MFA, enterprise SSO,… Read the review →

Strengths and trade-offs

• Keycloak — where it wins

  • Supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0, and SAML 2.0
  • Combines SSO, federation, MFA, and fine-grained authorization
  • Runs with VMs, containers, Kubernetes, and OpenShift

  Where it doesn't

  • Organizations must deploy and manage the server themselves
  • SCIM support is preview functionality
  • SCIM is disabled by default

• Ory — where it wins

  • OAuth 2.0, OIDC, SAML SSO, MFA, and SCIM in one stack
  • Supports managed cloud, self-hosted, web, API, and embedded deployments
  • Fine-grained authorization, adaptive access, and machine-to-machine tokens

  Where it doesn't

  • Growth pricing is listed at $9,350 annually
  • Environment-based plans require careful capacity planning
  • Enterprise capabilities are split across multiple deployment options

• Keycloak9.4/10 · Open source

  A broad, self-hosted IAM server for standards-based authentication and authorization.

  Visit KeycloakFull verdict →
• Ory8.8/10 · Free plan

  A flexible OAuth and identity stack for teams choosing cloud, self-hosting, or both.

  Visit OryFull verdict →