KeyCDN vs Squid

KeyCDN7.3Visit SSquid7.1Visit

Higher score KeyCDN #5 in Web Accelerator Software 7.3/10 From $0.04 · 14-day trial ✓ 2 of 5 features Visit KeyCDN

vs

S Squid #6 in Web Accelerator Software 7.1/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 5 features Visit Squid

• KeyCDN fits best

  Cost-conscious teams needing a full CDN

• Squid fits best

  Free self-hosted caching and proxying

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature	KeyCDN 7.3/10 Visit ↗	SSquid 7.1/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	7.3	7.1
Ranking	#5 in Web Accelerator Software	#6 in Web Accelerator Software
Best for	Cost-conscious teams needing a full CDN	Free self-hosted caching and proxying
Pricing model	Paid	Free
Starting price	Not published	Not published
Free plan	—	✓ (best)
Free trial	—	—
Deployment	Cloud	Self-hosted
Platforms	Web	Windows, macOS, Linux
Support	Docs · 24/7	Email, Community, Docs
Built for	Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise	Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features KeyCDN 2/5 · Squid 0/5
Image optimization	✓ (best)	Not published
Web application firewall	Not published	Not published
Bot management	Not published	Not published
Origin shield	✓ (best)	Not published
Cache purge API	Not published	Not published
Specs
Included bandwidth	Not published	Not published
Our review
Pros	Pull and Push Zones support origin-based and uploaded content Real-time image processing, HLS video delivery and cache purging REST API, real-time logs, TLS and CMS integrations	Caches HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, and gopher objects in memory or on disk Supports reverse-proxy acceleration and cache-peer load balancing Includes access controls, request logging, and cache restoration after restart
Cons	Traffic rates vary by region and volume No free plan; access is through a paid service Support channels listed are documentation	Self-hosting puts deployment and operations on your team Primarily focused on proxy caching rather than turnkey global delivery Requires configuration to manage cache peers, access controls, and SSL
Our verdict	KeyCDN is a content delivery network for website owners and application developers who need to cache and serve web content or video from edge servers. Pull Zones fetch content from an origin server, while Push Zones store uploaded content… Read the review →	Squid is open-source proxy caching software for web clients and content delivery environments. It suits network operators, websites, and organizations that want to cache and reuse frequently requested web objects while managing the proxy… Read the review →

Strengths and trade-offs

• KeyCDN — where it wins

  • Pull and Push Zones support origin-based and uploaded content
  • Real-time image processing, HLS video delivery and cache purging
  • REST API, real-time logs, TLS and CMS integrations

  Where it doesn't

  • Traffic rates vary by region and volume
  • No free plan; access is through a paid service
  • Support channels listed are documentation

• Squid — where it wins

  • Caches HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, and gopher objects in memory or on disk
  • Supports reverse-proxy acceleration and cache-peer load balancing
  • Includes access controls, request logging, and cache restoration after restart

  Where it doesn't

  • Self-hosting puts deployment and operations on your team
  • Primarily focused on proxy caching rather than turnkey global delivery
  • Requires configuration to manage cache peers, access controls, and SSL

• KeyCDN7.3/10 · From $0.04 · 14-day trial

  A usage-priced CDN with caching, image processing, video delivery and API controls.

  Visit KeyCDNFull verdict →
• SSquid7.1/10 · Free plan

  Open-source caching and proxying for teams prepared to run it themselves.

  Visit SquidFull verdict →