Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Time-Series Databases

kdb+ vs TDengine

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score kdb+ #4 in Time-Series Databases 8.9/10 Pricing on request ✓ 3 of 3 features Visit kdb+
TDengine #10 in Time-Series Databases 8.2/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 3 features Visit TDengine

kdb+ leads on 0 checks, TDengine on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scorekdb+ · 8.9/10
  • Free planonly TDengine

kdb+ scores higher on our rubric for time-series databases: 8.9 against 8.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #10.

kdb+ is the better fit for high-performance financial time-series processing. TDengine is the better fit for industrial telemetry and high-volume ingestion.

  • kdb+ fits best

    High-performance financial time-series processing

  • TDengine fits best

    Industrial telemetry and high-volume ingestion

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature kdb+ 8.9/10 Visit ↗ TDengine 8.2/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.9 8.2
Ranking #4 in Time-Series Databases #10 in Time-Series Databases
Best for High-performance financial time-series processing Industrial telemetry and high-volume ingestion
Pricing model Paid Free plan + paid
Starting price Pricing on request —
Free plan Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Windows, macOS, Linux Web, Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Community, Docs Docs · 24/7
Integrations 17 integrations 14 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features kdb+ 3/3 · TDengine 3/3
SQL support ✓ ✓
Retention policies ✓ ✓
Horizontal scaling ✓ ✓
Specs
Deployment Both Both
Query languages q, q-SQL SQL
Ingestion methods tickerplant, feed handlers, batch mode, TCP/IP, Apache Kafka, Python, Java, C SQL, InfluxDB Line Protocol, OpenTSDB Telnet Protocol, OpenTSDB JSON Protocol, MQTT, OPC UA, OPC DA, Kafka, CSV, PI System, MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle, MongoDB
Our review
Pros
  • Columnar storage with in-memory real-time processing
  • Tickerplant, feedhandler, and partitioned historical database architecture
  • Integrations across ODBC, Kafka, Java, Python, C, and R
  • Supports MQTT, Kafka, OPC UA, relational databases, and line protocols
  • Combines retention, clustering, stream processing, and edge-to-cloud synchronization
  • Offers self-hosted, managed cloud, and a free tier for up to 5,000 tags
Cons
  • Self-hosted deployment requires infrastructure ownership
  • Closed-source licensing limits source-level customization
  • Pricing requires contacting sales
  • Paid cloud pricing starts at $970 per month
  • Free Tier is limited to self-hosted usage up to 5,000 tags
  • Paid self-hosted licenses support 7,500 tags
Our verdict

kdb+ is a time-series database and analytics engine for organizations processing real-time and historical data. Its design combines columnar storage, in-memory execution, persistent databases, temporal data types, and the q programming and…

Read the review →

TDengine is a distributed time-series database for industrial and IoT data. It stores and queries timestamped data through TDengine SQL, with features for configurable retention, distributed clustering, stream processing, data…

Read the review →
  1. kdb+Time-Series Databases 8.9Pricing on request
  2. TDengineTime-Series Databases 8.2Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • kdb+ — where it wins

    • Columnar storage with in-memory real-time processing
    • Tickerplant, feedhandler, and partitioned historical database architecture
    • Integrations across ODBC, Kafka, Java, Python, C, and R

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosted deployment requires infrastructure ownership
    • Closed-source licensing limits source-level customization
    • Pricing requires contacting sales
  • TDengine — where it wins

    • Supports MQTT, Kafka, OPC UA, relational databases, and line protocols
    • Combines retention, clustering, stream processing, and edge-to-cloud synchronization
    • Offers self-hosted, managed cloud, and a free tier for up to 5,000 tags

    Where it doesn't

    • Paid cloud pricing starts at $970 per month
    • Free Tier is limited to self-hosted usage up to 5,000 tags
    • Paid self-hosted licenses support 7,500 tags
  • kdb+8.9/10 · Pricing on request

    A specialized, self-hosted engine for real-time and historical financial analytics.

    Visit kdb+Full verdict →
  • TDengine8.2/10 · Free plan

    A flexible industrial time-series database with broad ingestion and deployment options.

    Visit TDengineFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update