Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · BDD Testing Tools

Karate vs Behat

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Karate #3 in BDD Testing Tools 8.3/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Karate
Behat #4 in BDD Testing Tools 8.3/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 4 features Visit Behat

Karate leads on 0 checks, Behat on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresKarate · 4 of 4

Karate and Behat score identically on our rubric (8.3 out of 10) for bdd testing tools; Karate sits at #3 and Behat at #4 in our editorial ranking, so the choice comes down to fit.

Karate is the better fit for teams testing APIs and web applications. Behat is the better fit for PHP teams using Gherkin.

  • Karate fits best

    Teams testing APIs and web applications

  • Behat fits best

    PHP teams using Gherkin

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Karate 8.3/10 Visit ↗ Behat 8.3/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.3 8.3
Ranking #3 in BDD Testing Tools #4 in BDD Testing Tools
Best for Teams testing APIs and web applications PHP teams using Gherkin
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free
Starting price — Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted Self-hosted
Support Email, Community, Docs Docs
Integrations 9 integrations 6 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Karate 4/4 · Behat 3/4
Gherkin support ✓ ✓
Parallel execution ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Browser testing ✓ ✓
API access ✓ ✓
Specs
Supported languages Not checked yet Not checked yet
Execution mode Local Local
Our review
Pros
  • Tests REST, GraphQL, SOAP, and HTTP APIs with Gherkin feature files
  • Combines browser automation, mocks, and Gatling performance testing
  • Supports parallel execution and CLI, Maven, Gradle, or Java API runs
  • Business-readable Gherkin scenarios connect to PHP step definitions.
  • Configurable suites, profiles, filters, tags, hooks, and extensions.
  • Supports browser, API, database, filesystem, shell, and PHP testing.
Cons
  • Self-hosted deployment requires teams to manage their own environment
  • Paid tiers add key capabilities such as async testing and commercial support
  • Browser automation depends on Chrome, WebDriver, or cross-browser drivers
  • Browser testing depends on the Mink integration and compatible drivers.
  • The workflow is centered on PHP and may not suit non-PHP teams.
  • Command-line execution may require more configuration than visual tools.
Our verdict

Karate is an open-source test automation framework for teams testing APIs and web applications. Its Gherkin feature files include built-in step definitions, HTTP operations, and assertions, with support for REST, GraphQL, SOAP, and HTTP…

Read the review →

Behat is an open-source behavior-driven development framework for PHP teams that want business-readable specifications to become automated checks. It executes Gherkin feature files from the command line and connects each scenario to…

Read the review →
  1. KarateBDD Testing Tools 8.3Free plan
  2. BehatBDD Testing Tools 8.3Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Karate — where it wins

    • Tests REST, GraphQL, SOAP, and HTTP APIs with Gherkin feature files
    • Combines browser automation, mocks, and Gatling performance testing
    • Supports parallel execution and CLI, Maven, Gradle, or Java API runs

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosted deployment requires teams to manage their own environment
    • Paid tiers add key capabilities such as async testing and commercial support
    • Browser automation depends on Chrome, WebDriver, or cross-browser drivers
  • Behat — where it wins

    • Business-readable Gherkin scenarios connect to PHP step definitions.
    • Configurable suites, profiles, filters, tags, hooks, and extensions.
    • Supports browser, API, database, filesystem, shell, and PHP testing.

    Where it doesn't

    • Browser testing depends on the Mink integration and compatible drivers.
    • The workflow is centered on PHP and may not suit non-PHP teams.
    • Command-line execution may require more configuration than visual tools.

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update