Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Ci Cd Platforms

Jenkins vs Bamboo

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Higher score Jenkins #4 in Ci Cd Platforms 8.9/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 3 features Visit Jenkins
Bamboo #7 in Ci Cd Platforms 8.6/10 Pricing on request · 30-day trial Free trial✓ 0 of 3 features Visit Atlassian

Jenkins leads on 1 check, Bamboo on 0, and 0 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreJenkins · 8.9/10
  • Free planonly Jenkins
  • Free trialonly Bamboo

Jenkins scores higher on our rubric for ci cd platforms: 8.9 against 8.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #7.

Jenkins offers free plan; Bamboo doesn't.

Jenkins is the better fit for teams wanting extensible, self-hosted CI/CD. Bamboo is the better fit for atlassian-heavy enterprises preferring self-hosting.

  • Jenkins fits best

    Teams wanting extensible, self-hosted CI/CD

  • Bamboo fits best

    Atlassian-heavy enterprises preferring self-hosting

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Jenkins 8.9/10 Visit ↗ Bamboo 8.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.9 8.6
Ranking #4 in Ci Cd Platforms #7 in Ci Cd Platforms
Best for Teams wanting extensible, self-hosted CI/CD Atlassian-heavy enterprises preferring self-hosting
Pricing model Free Paid
Starting price Free plan —
Free plan ✓ (best) —
Free trial — 30 days
Deployment Self-hosted Self-hosted
Platforms Web, Windows, macOS, Linux Web, Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Docs Tickets, Community, Docs
Integrations 7 integrations 14 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Jenkins 0/3 · Bamboo 0/3
Self-hosted runners Not checked yet Not checked yet
Pipeline as code Not checked yet Not checked yet
Deployment automation Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment model Not checked yet Not checked yet
Included build minutes Not checked yet Not checked yet
Parallel jobs Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Define pipelines as code with Jenkinsfiles in declarative or scripted syntax.
  • Run concurrent and parallel work across controllers, agents, and executors.
  • Extend workflows with plugins and integrations for Git, Docker, and Kubernetes.
  • Multi-stage builds with parallel jobs and elastic or ephemeral agents
  • Per-environment deployment permissions and shared build artifacts
  • Integrations across Bitbucket, Jira, Confluence, GitHub, Docker and AWS CodeDeploy
Cons
  • Requires teams to host and manage the CI/CD infrastructure themselves.
  • No vendor-hosted option is available.
  • Support channels listed are documentation only.
  • No Atlassian-managed hosted execution; cloud builds point to Bitbucket Pipelines
  • No free plan, and pricing is handled through sales contacts
  • Data Center products are scheduled to reach end of life on March 28, 2029
Our verdict

Jenkins is an open-source automation server for building, testing, delivering, and deploying software. It is aimed at teams that want to shape their own CI/CD workflows and operate the infrastructure behind them, from small teams to…

Read the review →

Bamboo is Atlassian’s self-managed continuous integration and delivery server for automating builds, tests, releases and deployments. It suits small, mid-market and enterprise teams that need to run CI/CD infrastructure in their own…

Read the review →
  1. JenkinsCi Cd Platforms 8.9Free plan
  2. BambooCi Cd Platforms 8.6Pricing on request · 30-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Jenkins — where it wins

    • Define pipelines as code with Jenkinsfiles in declarative or scripted syntax.
    • Run concurrent and parallel work across controllers, agents, and executors.
    • Extend workflows with plugins and integrations for Git, Docker, and Kubernetes.

    Where it doesn't

    • Requires teams to host and manage the CI/CD infrastructure themselves.
    • No vendor-hosted option is available.
    • Support channels listed are documentation only.

  • Bamboo — where it wins

    • Multi-stage builds with parallel jobs and elastic or ephemeral agents
    • Per-environment deployment permissions and shared build artifacts
    • Integrations across Bitbucket, Jira, Confluence, GitHub, Docker and AWS CodeDeploy

    Where it doesn't

    • No Atlassian-managed hosted execution; cloud builds point to Bitbucket Pipelines
    • No free plan, and pricing is handled through sales contacts
    • Data Center products are scheduled to reach end of life on March 28, 2029
  • Jenkins8.9/10 · Free plan

    A flexible, self-hosted CI/CD server for teams ready to manage their automation infrastructure.

    Visit JenkinsFull verdict →
  • Bamboo8.6/10 · Pricing on request · 30-day trial

    A self-hosted CI/CD server for Atlassian-heavy teams needing controlled environments.

    Visit AtlassianFull verdict →

More comparisons

All ci cd platforms comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update