Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Software Development Analytics Tools

Jellyfish vs Hatica

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 2 checks side by side
Higher score Jellyfish #2 in Software Development Analytics Tools 8.8/10 Pricing on request ✓ 1 of 3 features Visit Jellyfish
Hatica #3 in Software Development Analytics Tools 8.6/10 Free plan · 14-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 1 of 3 features Visit Hatica

Jellyfish leads on 0 checks, Hatica on 1, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreJellyfish · 8.8/10
  • Free planonly Hatica
  • Free trialonly Hatica

Jellyfish scores higher on our rubric for software development analytics tools: 8.8 against 8.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #3.

Hatica offers free plan; Jellyfish doesn't.

Jellyfish is the better fit for organizations tracking engineering investment and AI impact. Hatica is the better fit for teams seeking broad metrics at a modest per-user price.

  • Jellyfish fits best

    Organizations tracking engineering investment and AI impact

  • Hatica fits best

    Teams seeking broad metrics at a modest per-user price

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Jellyfish 8.8/10 Visit ↗ Hatica 8.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.8 8.6
Ranking #2 in Software Development Analytics Tools #3 in Software Development Analytics Tools
Best for Organizations tracking engineering investment and AI impact Teams seeking broad metrics at a modest per-user price
Pricing model Paid Free plan + paid
Starting price — $19/user/mo
Free plan — ✓ (best)
Free trial — 14 days
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Support Docs Email, Live chat, Phone, Docs
Compliance SOC 2 SOC 2, GDPR, SSO/SAML
Integrations 10 integrations 20 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Jellyfish 1/3 · Hatica 1/3
DORA metrics ✓ ✓
Developer experience surveys Not checked yet Not checked yet
Team-level reporting Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Data source connectors Not checked yet Not checked yet
Delivery metrics Not checked yet Not checked yet
Deployment option Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Tracks DORA, delivery, and reliability metrics across engineering workflows
  • Analyzes AI-tool adoption, usage, and productivity across multiple tools
  • Links engineering investment allocation with developer experience and delivery
  • Free plan includes unlimited team members and data sources.
  • Pro covers DORA, delivery, activity, throughput, and wellbeing metrics.
  • Connects to Git, planning, communication, and CI/CD tools.
Cons
  • Quote-based pricing varies by seats and selected modules
  • Cloud-only deployment may not suit teams requiring another hosting model
  • Wide-ranging analytics may exceed the needs of teams seeking a single metric tool
  • Build-your-own and custom dashboards are in the $29 Business plan.
  • Self-hosting and private-cloud deployment are Enterprise options.
  • The range of metrics and dashboards may exceed teams' needs for a narrow view.
Our verdict

Engineering leaders, managers, platform and product teams, and finance groups can use Jellyfish to connect data from development and delivery systems with business outcomes. The cloud platform covers DORA metrics, workflow analytics,…

Read the review →

Hatica brings engineering activity, delivery, project, developer experience, and DORA metrics into dashboards for software development teams. It is aimed at teams that want to examine work across individuals, teams, projects, and the…

Read the review →
  1. JellyfishSoftware Development Analytics Tools 8.8Pricing on request
  2. HaticaSoftware Development Analytics Tools 8.6Free plan · 14-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Jellyfish — where it wins

    • Tracks DORA, delivery, and reliability metrics across engineering workflows
    • Analyzes AI-tool adoption, usage, and productivity across multiple tools
    • Links engineering investment allocation with developer experience and delivery

    Where it doesn't

    • Quote-based pricing varies by seats and selected modules
    • Cloud-only deployment may not suit teams requiring another hosting model
    • Wide-ranging analytics may exceed the needs of teams seeking a single metric tool
  • Hatica — where it wins

    • Free plan includes unlimited team members and data sources.
    • Pro covers DORA, delivery, activity, throughput, and wellbeing metrics.
    • Connects to Git, planning, communication, and CI/CD tools.

    Where it doesn't

    • Build-your-own and custom dashboards are in the $29 Business plan.
    • Self-hosting and private-cloud deployment are Enterprise options.
    • The range of metrics and dashboards may exceed teams' needs for a narrow view.
  • Jellyfish8.8/10 · Pricing on request

    Connect engineering delivery, investment, developer experience, and AI-tool impact in one cloud platform.

    Visit JellyfishFull verdict →
  • Hatica8.6/10 · Free plan · 14-day trial

    Broad engineering metrics, with a free plan and paid tiers starting at $19 per member monthly.

    Visit HaticaFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update