iTRUST EHR vs LiquidEHR

iTRUST EHR9.3Visit LiquidEHR8.4Visit

Higher score iTRUST EHR #1 in Optometry Software 9.3/10 14-day trial Free trial✓ 5 of 5 features Visit iTRUST

vs

LiquidEHR #8 in Optometry Software 8.4/10 Paid ✓ 3 of 5 features Visit LiquidEHR

• iTRUST EHR fits best

  Feature-rich optometry practices seeking cloud EHR

• LiquidEHR fits best

  Small and mid-sized optometry practices

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature	iTRUST EHR 9.3/10 Visit ↗	LiquidEHR 8.4/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	9.3	8.4
Ranking	#1 in Optometry Software	#8 in Optometry Software
Best for	Feature-rich optometry practices seeking cloud EHR	Small and mid-sized optometry practices
Pricing model	Paid	Paid
Starting price	—	$199/mo
Free plan	—	—
Free trial	14 days	—
Deployment	Cloud	Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms	Web	Web
Support	Email, Phone, Docs, Tickets	Phone, Email, Live chat
Compliance	HIPAA	HIPAA
Integrations	15 integrations	4 integrations
Built for	Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise	Solo, Small business, Mid-market
Features iTRUST EHR 5/5 · LiquidEHR 3/5
Optometry EHR	✓	✓
Appointment scheduling	✓	✓
Optical inventory	✓	✓
Patient portal	✓ (best)	Not checked yet
Telehealth	✓ (best)	Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment	Cloud	Hybrid
Our review
Pros	Optometry chart templates, auto-fill and ICD-10 coding suggestions Combines inventory, online booking, telehealth, POS and claims workflows Connects with optical suppliers and diagnostic equipment integrations	Optometry-specific records with configurable exam documentation Combines scheduling, claims, e-prescribing and dispensary inventory Cloud and in-office plans include all modules and free setup
Cons	Starting price is listed in a separate U.S.-specific pricing post Plan prices are custom quotes, making tier comparisons less direct Enterprise / Custom is the tier with dedicated support and SLAs	No free plan; monthly pricing starts at $199 Cloud setup costs $299 per month, compared with $199 in-office Does not offer 24/7 support
Our verdict	iTRUST EHR brings optometry charting and practice management into a cloud system for eye-care practices. It suits teams looking to manage exams, patient records, scheduling, optical inventory and billing workflows in one product. Its chart… Read the review →	LiquidEHR brings optometry-specific electronic health records together with practice management tools for independent optometrists and multi-provider clinics. Its records support configurable exam documentation, while patient management… Read the review →

Strengths and trade-offs

• iTRUST EHR — where it wins

  • Optometry chart templates, auto-fill and ICD-10 coding suggestions
  • Combines inventory, online booking, telehealth, POS and claims workflows
  • Connects with optical suppliers and diagnostic equipment integrations

  Where it doesn't

  • Starting price is listed in a separate U.S.-specific pricing post
  • Plan prices are custom quotes, making tier comparisons less direct
  • Enterprise / Custom is the tier with dedicated support and SLAs

• LiquidEHR — where it wins

  • Optometry-specific records with configurable exam documentation
  • Combines scheduling, claims, e-prescribing and dispensary inventory
  • Cloud and in-office plans include all modules and free setup

  Where it doesn't

  • No free plan; monthly pricing starts at $199
  • Cloud setup costs $299 per month, compared with $199 in-office
  • Does not offer 24/7 support

• iTRUST EHR9.3/10 · 14-day trial

  Optometry-focused cloud EHR with clinical, optical, booking and billing workflows.

  Visit iTRUSTFull verdict →
• LiquidEHR8.4/10 · Paid

  Core optometry records and practice tools, from $199 per month.

  Visit LiquidEHRFull verdict →