Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Medical Imaging Software

Intelerad IntelePACS vs GE HealthCare Centricity Universal Viewer

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score Intelerad IntelePACS #2 in Medical Imaging Software 9.2/10 Pricing on request ✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Intelerad

Intelerad IntelePACS leads on 0 checks, GE HealthCare Centricity Universal Viewer on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreIntelerad IntelePACS · 9.2/10
  • Most featuresGE HealthCare Centricity Universal Viewer · 3 of 4

Intelerad IntelePACS scores higher on our rubric for medical imaging software: 9.2 against 9.1 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #3.

Intelerad IntelePACS is the better fit for organizations needing cloud-first enterprise PACS. GE HealthCare Centricity Universal Viewer is the better fit for multispecialty imaging teams needing rich viewing.

  • Intelerad IntelePACS fits best

    Organizations needing cloud-first enterprise PACS

  • GE HealthCare Centricity Universal Viewer fits best

    Multispecialty imaging teams needing rich viewing

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Intelerad IntelePACS 9.2/10 Visit ↗ GE HealthCare Centricity Universal Viewer 9.1/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.2 9.1
Ranking #2 in Medical Imaging Software #3 in Medical Imaging Software
Best for Organizations needing cloud-first enterprise PACS Multispecialty imaging teams needing rich viewing
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request Pricing on request
Free plan Not checked yet Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Desktop, Mobile
Platforms Web Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android
Integrations 7 integrations 6 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Intelerad IntelePACS 0/4 · GE HealthCare Centricity Universal Viewer 3/4
DICOM viewer Not checked yet ✓ (best)
PACS storage Not checked yet Not checked yet
AI tools Not checked yet ✓ (best)
DICOM worklist Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Specs
Deployment Hybrid Not checked yet
Modalities supported Not checked yet CT, MR, Enhanced CT, Enhanced MR, US, PT, XA, RF, SC, CR, DX, MG, Breast Tomosynthesis, IO, VL, NM, Endoscopic, Microscopic, Photographic Image
Our review
Pros
  • Combines diagnostic viewing with storage, routing, query/retrieve, and worklists
  • Supports PET, SPECT, breast, 2D/3D, and multi-modality workflows
  • Integrates with HIS, RIS, EHR, VNA, voice, and AI applications
  • Views studies in 2D, 3D and 4D, with MPR/MIP and volumetric rendering
  • Supports breast imaging and cardiology workflows alongside broad modality coverage
  • Connects DICOM and XDS content with third-party AI results and EHR systems
Cons
  • Pricing requires contacting sales
  • Support channel listed is documentation
  • Enterprise breadth may exceed the needs of smaller imaging teams
  • Pricing requires contacting sales
  • Broad workflow scope may be more than a single-specialty team needs
  • A zero-footprint browser viewer does not by itself describe the full deployment model
Our verdict

Intelerad IntelePACS is an enterprise picture archiving and communication system for hospitals, radiology practices, imaging centers, and distributed healthcare organizations. It centralizes medical-image storage, retrieval, and sharing…

Read the review →

GE HealthCare Centricity Universal Viewer is an enterprise imaging application for radiologists, cardiologists and other clinicians who need access to studies across modalities and clinical settings. It combines a web-based streaming…

Read the review →
  1. Intelerad IntelePACSMedical Imaging Software 9.2Pricing on request
  2. GE HealthCare Centricity Universal ViewerMedical Imaging Software 9.1Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Intelerad IntelePACS — where it wins

    • Combines diagnostic viewing with storage, routing, query/retrieve, and worklists
    • Supports PET, SPECT, breast, 2D/3D, and multi-modality workflows
    • Integrates with HIS, RIS, EHR, VNA, voice, and AI applications

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting sales
    • Support channel listed is documentation
    • Enterprise breadth may exceed the needs of smaller imaging teams
  • GE HealthCare Centricity Universal Viewer — where it wins

    • Views studies in 2D, 3D and 4D, with MPR/MIP and volumetric rendering
    • Supports breast imaging and cardiology workflows alongside broad modality coverage
    • Connects DICOM and XDS content with third-party AI results and EHR systems

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting sales
    • Broad workflow scope may be more than a single-specialty team needs
    • A zero-footprint browser viewer does not by itself describe the full deployment model
  • Intelerad IntelePACS9.2/10 · Pricing on request

    Enterprise PACS combining diagnostic viewing, DICOM services, portals, and remote reading.

    Visit InteleradFull verdict →
  • GE HealthCare Centricity Universal Viewer9.1/10 · Pricing on request

    Broad image viewing and specialty workflows for teams across clinical settings.

    Visit siteFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update