Head-to-head · Medical Imaging Software
GE HealthCare Centricity Universal Viewer vs Fujifilm Synapse PACS
GE HealthCare Centricity Universal Viewer leads on 0 checks, Fujifilm Synapse PACS on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreGE HealthCare Centricity Universal Viewer · 9.1/10
- Most featuresGE HealthCare Centricity Universal Viewer · 3 of 4
GE HealthCare Centricity Universal Viewer scores higher on our rubric for medical imaging software: 9.1 against 8.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #5.
GE HealthCare Centricity Universal Viewer is the better fit for multispecialty imaging teams needing rich viewing. Fujifilm Synapse PACS is the better fit for multispecialty departments using AI-enabled PACS.
- GE HealthCare Centricity Universal Viewer fits best
Multispecialty imaging teams needing rich viewing
- Fujifilm Synapse PACS fits best
Multispecialty departments using AI-enabled PACS
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | GE HealthCare Centricity Universal Viewer 9.1/10 Visit ↗ | Fujifilm Synapse PACS 8.9/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Ranking | #3 in Medical Imaging Software | #5 in Medical Imaging Software |
| Best for | Multispecialty imaging teams needing rich viewing | Multispecialty departments using AI-enabled PACS |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Starting price | Pricing on request | Pricing on request |
| Free plan | Not checked yet | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud, Desktop, Mobile | Cloud, Self-hosted |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android | Web |
| Integrations | 6 integrations | 5 integrations |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features GE HealthCare Centricity Universal Viewer 3/4 · Fujifilm Synapse PACS 0/4 | ||
| DICOM viewer | ✓ (best) | Not checked yet |
| PACS storage | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| AI tools | ✓ (best) | Not checked yet |
| DICOM worklist | ✓ (best) | Not checked yet |
| Specs | ||
| Deployment | Not checked yet | Hybrid |
| Modalities supported | CT, MR, Enhanced CT, Enhanced MR, US, PT, XA, RF, SC, CR, DX, MG, Breast Tomosynthesis, IO, VL, NM, Endoscopic, Microscopic, Photographic Image | Not checked yet |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | GE HealthCare Centricity Universal Viewer is an enterprise imaging application for radiologists, cardiologists and other clinicians who need access to studies across modalities and clinical settings. It combines a web-based streaming… Read the review → |
Fujifilm Synapse PACS is an enterprise picture archiving and communication system for healthcare organizations that need diagnostic viewing across departments. It brings radiology, mammography, cardiology, pathology, and… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
GE HealthCare Centricity Universal Viewer — where it wins
- Views studies in 2D, 3D and 4D, with MPR/MIP and volumetric rendering
- Supports breast imaging and cardiology workflows alongside broad modality coverage
- Connects DICOM and XDS content with third-party AI results and EHR systems
Where it doesn't
- Pricing requires contacting sales
- Broad workflow scope may be more than a single-specialty team needs
- A zero-footprint browser viewer does not by itself describe the full deployment model
Fujifilm Synapse PACS — where it wins
- Combines radiology, mammography, cardiology, pathology, and specialty imaging.
- Supports DICOM and non-DICOM access, plus DICOMweb, FHIR, XDS, and REST.
- Integrates validated AI algorithms with configurable study prioritization.
Where it doesn't
- Pricing requires contacting sales.
- Enterprise focus may not suit smaller imaging teams.
- AI worklist assignment depends on customer-defined workflows.
- GE HealthCare Centricity Universal Viewer9.1/10 · Pricing on request
Broad image viewing and specialty workflows for teams across clinical settings.
Visit siteFull verdict → - Fujifilm Synapse PACS8.9/10 · Pricing on request
A web-based PACS that brings multispecialty imaging and AI workflows into one viewer.
Visit FujifilmFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Siemens syngo Carbon vs GE HealthCare Centricity Universal Viewer
- Siemens syngo Carbon vs Fujifilm Synapse PACS
- Intelerad IntelePACS vs GE HealthCare Centricity Universal Viewer
- GE HealthCare Centricity Universal Viewer vs Visage 7
- GE HealthCare Centricity Universal Viewer vs Sectra PACS
- GE HealthCare Centricity Universal Viewer vs Siemens syngo.via
- GE HealthCare Centricity Universal Viewer vs INFINITT PACS
- Fujifilm Synapse PACS vs Siemens syngo.via
All medical imaging software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update



