Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Legal Intake Software

Intaker vs Miranda

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score Intaker #2 in Legal Intake Software 9.2/10 Paid ✓ 5 of 5 features Visit Intaker
Miranda #5 in Legal Intake Software 8.9/10 Pricing on request ✓ 5 of 5 features Visit Miranda

Intaker leads on 0 checks, Miranda on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreIntaker · 9.2/10

Intaker scores higher on our rubric for legal intake software: 9.2 against 8.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #5.

Intaker is the better fit for firms needing omnichannel lead conversion. Miranda is the better fit for firms needing deep AI triage and routing.

  • Intaker fits best

    Firms needing omnichannel lead conversion

  • Miranda fits best

    Firms needing deep AI triage and routing

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Intaker 9.2/10 Visit ↗ Miranda 8.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.2 8.9
Ranking #2 in Legal Intake Software #5 in Legal Intake Software
Best for Firms needing omnichannel lead conversion Firms needing deep AI triage and routing
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Not checked yet Pricing on request
Free plan Not checked yet Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Mobile Cloud
Platforms Web, iOS, Android Web
Support Email, Phone, Docs Email
Integrations 40+ integrations 14 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market
Features Intaker 5/5 · Miranda 5/5
Lead qualification ✓ ✓
Matter routing ✓ ✓
Appointment booking ✓ ✓
SMS follow-up ✓ ✓
Case system integrations ✓ ✓
Specs
Practice-area templates Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Covers chat, SMS, calls, email, WhatsApp, Meta, and LSA intake
  • Routes leads by case type, availability, or location
  • Connects with Clio, MyCase, Filevine, Salesforce, and more
  • Adaptive intake combines qualification, triage, and conflict checks
  • Routes matters and attorneys while booking or transferring consultations
  • Supports 40+ languages and connects with legal practice systems
Cons
  • Paid-service fees vary by usage
  • Broad workflow coverage may exceed simpler intake needs
  • AI agents and automation require process configuration
  • Pricing uses a monthly fee plus per-call usage charge
  • Broad workflow coverage may exceed the needs of simple intake teams
  • Founded in 2026, giving it less operating history than older products
Our verdict

Intaker is legal intake and lead-conversion software for law firms that want to capture, qualify, route, and follow up with prospective clients across multiple channels. Its scope includes website chat, SMS, phone, LSA, WhatsApp, and Meta,…

Read the review →

Miranda is a voice-AI intake platform for law firms handling inbound calls and prospective matters. It conducts conversational, adaptive intake; applies configurable qualification and legal-triage rules; checks statutes of limitations,…

Read the review →
  1. IntakerLegal Intake Software 9.2Paid
  2. MirandaLegal Intake Software 8.9Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Intaker — where it wins

    • Covers chat, SMS, calls, email, WhatsApp, Meta, and LSA intake
    • Routes leads by case type, availability, or location
    • Connects with Clio, MyCase, Filevine, Salesforce, and more

    Where it doesn't

    • Paid-service fees vary by usage
    • Broad workflow coverage may exceed simpler intake needs
    • AI agents and automation require process configuration
  • Miranda — where it wins

    • Adaptive intake combines qualification, triage, and conflict checks
    • Routes matters and attorneys while booking or transferring consultations
    • Supports 40+ languages and connects with legal practice systems

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing uses a monthly fee plus per-call usage charge
    • Broad workflow coverage may exceed the needs of simple intake teams
    • Founded in 2026, giving it less operating history than older products
  • Intaker9.2/10 · Paid

    A broad legal intake system for firms converting leads across chat, SMS, calls, and more.

    Visit IntakerFull verdict →
  • Miranda8.9/10 · Pricing on request

    A broad AI intake system for firms that need triage, routing, and follow-up automation.

    Visit MirandaFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update