Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · ML Experiment Tracking Software

InstantML vs LUML Flow

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score InstantML #13 in ML Experiment Tracking Software 7.6/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 4 of 5 features Visit InstantML
LUML Flow #19 in ML Experiment Tracking Software 7.0/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 5 of 5 features Visit LUML Flow

InstantML leads on 0 checks, LUML Flow on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreInstantML · 7.6/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresLUML Flow · 5 of 5

InstantML scores higher on our rubric for ml experiment tracking software: 7.6 against 7.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #13 and #19.

InstantML is the better fit for teams needing rich run analysis and imports. LUML Flow is the better fit for open-source teams tracking ML and LLM experiments.

  • InstantML fits best

    Teams needing rich run analysis and imports

  • LUML Flow fits best

    Open-source teams tracking ML and LLM experiments

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature InstantML 7.6/10 Visit ↗ LUML Flow 7.0/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 7.6 7.0
Ranking #13 in ML Experiment Tracking Software #19 in ML Experiment Tracking Software
Best for Teams needing rich run analysis and imports Open-source teams tracking ML and LLM experiments
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price $199/mo —
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Support Email, Docs Email, Community, Docs
Integrations 7 integrations 12 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market
Features InstantML 4/5 · LUML Flow 5/5
Run comparison ✓ ✓
Artifact tracking ✓ ✓
Dataset versioning Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Model registry ✓ ✓
API and SDK access ✓ ✓
Specs
Deployment options Hybrid Hybrid
Our review
Pros
  • Detailed search, charts, comparisons, and metric summaries for runs
  • Imports experiment history from W&B, Neptune, MLflow, and TensorBoard
  • Versioned artifacts, aliases, lineage, exports, REST API, and Python SDK
  • Tracks parameters, metrics, models, traces, evaluations, and attachments
  • Supports comparison, SQLite storage, and a versioned model registry
  • Integrates with PyTorch, LangChain, TensorFlow, and other ML tools
Cons
  • Free includes only 2 seats and 2 GiB of hosted storage
  • Pro costs $199 per workspace per month
  • Premium is required for the customer-owned storage option
  • Light is limited to 1 user, 1 orbit, 50 artifacts, and 1 satellite
  • Pro supports up to 5 users and 1,000 artifacts
  • Platform access is centered on API and self-hosted deployment
Our verdict

InstantML is a hosted machine-learning experiment tracking platform for small ML teams. Its Python SDK and API log training and evaluation runs with metrics, configurations, tags, notes, files, checkpoints, media, and external artifact…

Read the review →

LUML Flow is a local-first experiment tracker for predictive machine learning and generative AI workflows. It records parameters, metrics, model artifacts, traces, evaluation samples, scorers, human annotations, and file attachments while…

Read the review →
  1. InstantMLML Experiment Tracking Software 7.6Free plan
  2. LUML FlowML Experiment Tracking Software 7.0Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • InstantML — where it wins

    • Detailed search, charts, comparisons, and metric summaries for runs
    • Imports experiment history from W&B, Neptune, MLflow, and TensorBoard
    • Versioned artifacts, aliases, lineage, exports, REST API, and Python SDK

    Where it doesn't

    • Free includes only 2 seats and 2 GiB of hosted storage
    • Pro costs $199 per workspace per month
    • Premium is required for the customer-owned storage option
  • LUML Flow — where it wins

    • Tracks parameters, metrics, models, traces, evaluations, and attachments
    • Supports comparison, SQLite storage, and a versioned model registry
    • Integrates with PyTorch, LangChain, TensorFlow, and other ML tools

    Where it doesn't

    • Light is limited to 1 user, 1 orbit, 50 artifacts, and 1 satellite
    • Pro supports up to 5 users and 1,000 artifacts
    • Platform access is centered on API and self-hosted deployment

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update