Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Research Administration Software

Infonetica Research Flow vs Pure Award Management

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 7 checks side by side
Higher score Infonetica Research Flow #5 in Research Administration Software 8.8/10 Pricing on request ✓ 7 of 7 features Visit Infonetica
Pure Award Management #9 in Research Administration Software 8.3/10 Pricing on request ✓ 7 of 7 features Visit Elsevier

Infonetica Research Flow leads on 0 checks, Pure Award Management on 0, and 7 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 7 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreInfonetica Research Flow · 8.8/10

Infonetica Research Flow scores higher on our rubric for research administration software: 8.8 against 8.3 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #9.

Infonetica Research Flow is the better fit for universities needing configurable research workflows. Pure Award Management is the better fit for institutions linking awards to research outputs.

  • Infonetica Research Flow fits best

    Universities needing configurable research workflows

  • Pure Award Management fits best

    Institutions linking awards to research outputs

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Infonetica Research Flow 8.8/10 Visit ↗ Pure Award Management 8.3/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.8 8.3
Ranking #5 in Research Administration Software #9 in Research Administration Software
Best for Universities needing configurable research workflows Institutions linking awards to research outputs
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request Pricing on request
Free plan Not checked yet Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Support Email, Phone Email, Community, Docs
Compliance GDPR, ISO 27001 ISO 27001
Integrations 2 integrations 9 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Infonetica Research Flow 7/7 · Pure Award Management 7/7
Grant lifecycle ✓ ✓
Proposal management ✓ ✓
Award management ✓ ✓
Compliance workflows ✓ ✓
Agreement management ✓ ✓
Budget tracking ✓ ✓
API access ✓ ✓
Our review
Pros
  • Covers proposals, awards, ethics, contracts and post-award tracking
  • Configurable forms, automation rules, task routing and audit trails
  • API support connects HR, finance and other institutional systems
  • Covers funding, applications, awards, contracts, ethics, budgets, and renewals
  • Links awards and research activity with Scopus, Web of Science, and ORCID
  • Supports compliance workflows, reporting, milestones, and expenditure monitoring
Cons
  • Pricing requires a conversation with sales
  • Cloud deployment and web access may not fit every IT strategy
  • Its broad scope may exceed the needs of narrowly focused teams
  • Pricing requires contacting Elsevier
  • Best fit depends on the Pure research information management system
  • Its breadth may exceed the needs of institutions seeking one narrow workflow
Our verdict

Infonetica Research Flow is a cloud-based SaaS platform for universities, healthcare organisations and other research institutions. It brings together workflows, data and documents across funding applications, proposal review, ethics and…

Read the review →

Pure Award Management is Elsevier’s research administration module for institutions managing the funding lifecycle across faculties, campuses, and disciplines. It brings together funding opportunity identification, application creation and…

Read the review →
  1. Infonetica Research FlowResearch Administration Software 8.8Pricing on request
  2. Pure Award ManagementResearch Administration Software 8.3Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Infonetica Research Flow — where it wins

    • Covers proposals, awards, ethics, contracts and post-award tracking
    • Configurable forms, automation rules, task routing and audit trails
    • API support connects HR, finance and other institutional systems

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires a conversation with sales
    • Cloud deployment and web access may not fit every IT strategy
    • Its broad scope may exceed the needs of narrowly focused teams
  • Pure Award Management — where it wins

    • Covers funding, applications, awards, contracts, ethics, budgets, and renewals
    • Links awards and research activity with Scopus, Web of Science, and ORCID
    • Supports compliance workflows, reporting, milestones, and expenditure monitoring

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting Elsevier
    • Best fit depends on the Pure research information management system
    • Its breadth may exceed the needs of institutions seeking one narrow workflow
  • Infonetica Research Flow8.8/10 · Pricing on request

    A broad, configurable system for connected research administration workflows.

    Visit InfoneticaFull verdict →
  • Pure Award Management8.3/10 · Pricing on request

    A broad research administration module for linking funding workflows to outputs.

    Visit ElsevierFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update