Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Security Monitoring

IBM QRadar SIEM vs Amazon GuardDuty

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Higher score IBM QRadar SIEM #4 in Security Monitoring 8.9/10 Pricing on request ✓ 0 of 2 features Visit IBM
Amazon GuardDuty #8 in Security Monitoring 8.5/10 30-day trial Free trial✓ 0 of 2 features Visit AWS GuardDuty

IBM QRadar SIEM leads on 0 checks, Amazon GuardDuty on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreIBM QRadar SIEM · 8.9/10
  • Free trialonly Amazon GuardDuty

IBM QRadar SIEM scores higher on our rubric for security monitoring: 8.9 against 8.5 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #8.

IBM QRadar SIEM is the better fit for organizations standardizing on a self-hosted SIEM. Amazon GuardDuty is the better fit for teams running workloads on AWS.

  • IBM QRadar SIEM fits best

    Organizations standardizing on a self-hosted SIEM

  • Amazon GuardDuty fits best

    Teams running workloads on AWS

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature IBM QRadar SIEM 8.9/10 Visit ↗ Amazon GuardDuty 8.5/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.9 8.5
Ranking #4 in Security Monitoring #8 in Security Monitoring
Best for Organizations standardizing on a self-hosted SIEM Teams running workloads on AWS
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request —
Free plan Not checked yet —
Free trial — 30 days
Deployment Self-hosted Cloud
Integrations 1 integrations 15 integrations
Features IBM QRadar SIEM 0/2 · Amazon GuardDuty 0/2
Automated response Not checked yet Not checked yet
Log search Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment Not checked yet Not checked yet
Data source coverage Not checked yet Not checked yet
Data retention Not checked yet Not checked yet
Alerting channels Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Centralizes security visibility across data sources
  • Combines real-time detection with user and network analytics
  • Supports Sigma, custom rules, AQL searches, and 700+ integrations
  • Monitors AWS logs, workloads, and data across multiple protection plans
  • Covers EKS, EC2, Fargate, Lambda, S3, RDS, and AI workloads
  • Routes findings into EventBridge-based notification and response workflows
Cons
  • Self-hosted deployment requires on-premises hardware or virtual appliances
  • Pricing is custom and requires contacting IBM
  • Retention varies by deployment and retention bucket
  • Coverage is limited to AWS cloud environments
  • Pay-as-you-go costs vary by data source and AWS Region
  • The 30-day offer is a trial, not a permanent free plan
Our verdict

IBM QRadar SIEM brings security events and network activity into a centralized environment for security operations teams. Its self-hosted deployment is aimed at organizations that want to standardize SIEM operations on premises, using…

Read the review →

Amazon GuardDuty is a managed threat detection service for teams monitoring AWS accounts, workloads, and data. It analyzes AWS logs and activity to generate security findings with severity and resource details. Coverage spans foundational…

Read the review →
  1. IBM QRadar SIEMSecurity Monitoring 8.9Pricing on request
  2. Amazon GuardDutySecurity Monitoring 8.530-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • IBM QRadar SIEM — where it wins

    • Centralizes security visibility across data sources
    • Combines real-time detection with user and network analytics
    • Supports Sigma, custom rules, AQL searches, and 700+ integrations

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosted deployment requires on-premises hardware or virtual appliances
    • Pricing is custom and requires contacting IBM
    • Retention varies by deployment and retention bucket
  • Amazon GuardDuty — where it wins

    • Monitors AWS logs, workloads, and data across multiple protection plans
    • Covers EKS, EC2, Fargate, Lambda, S3, RDS, and AI workloads
    • Routes findings into EventBridge-based notification and response workflows

    Where it doesn't

    • Coverage is limited to AWS cloud environments
    • Pay-as-you-go costs vary by data source and AWS Region
    • The 30-day offer is a trial, not a permanent free plan
  • IBM QRadar SIEM8.9/10 · Pricing on request

    A self-hosted SIEM with real-time detection, analytics, custom rules, and broad integrations.

    Visit IBMFull verdict →
  • Amazon GuardDuty8.5/10 · 30-day trial

    Broad AWS threat detection with findings and response workflows, limited to AWS environments.

    Visit AWS GuardDutyFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update