Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Docker Hosting

IBM Code Engine vs AWS App Runner

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Higher score IBM Code Engine #4 in Docker Hosting 8.9/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 4 features Visit IBM Cloud
AWS App Runner #8 in Docker Hosting 8.5/10 Paid ✓ 0 of 4 features Visit AWS App Runner

IBM Code Engine leads on 1 check, AWS App Runner on 0, and 0 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreIBM Code Engine · 8.9/10
  • Free planonly IBM Code Engine

IBM Code Engine scores higher on our rubric for docker hosting: 8.9 against 8.5 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #8.

IBM Code Engine offers free plan; AWS App Runner doesn't.

IBM Code Engine is the better fit for IBM Cloud users wanting serverless containers. AWS App Runner is the better fit for existing AWS teams running App Runner services.

  • IBM Code Engine fits best

    IBM Cloud users wanting serverless containers

  • AWS App Runner fits best

    Existing AWS teams running App Runner services

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature IBM Code Engine 8.9/10 Visit ↗ AWS App Runner 8.5/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.9 8.5
Ranking #4 in Docker Hosting #8 in Docker Hosting
Best for IBM Cloud users wanting serverless containers Existing AWS teams running App Runner services
Pricing model Free plan + paid Paid
Starting price — $0.007/GB usage-based
Free plan ✓ (best) —
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Platforms Web, Linux, Windows, macOS Web
Integrations 10 integrations 2 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features IBM Code Engine 0/4 · AWS App Runner 0/4
Autoscaling Not checked yet Not checked yet
Persistent storage Not checked yet Not checked yet
Custom domains Not checked yet Not checked yet
Managed databases Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment methods Not checked yet Not checked yet
Available regions Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Runs applications, batch jobs, and event-triggered functions.
  • Scales workloads to zero when idle and supports parallel fleets.
  • Connects to IBM Cloud services through service bindings.
  • Deploys from source code or container images
  • Automatically scales active instances and load balances applications
  • Supports encrypted traffic and private VPC connectivity
Cons
  • Usage-based charges can vary with resource and HTTP-call consumption.
  • Focuses on managed serverless compute, not conventional website hosting.
  • Its service integrations center on IBM Cloud and a narrower ecosystem.
  • Stopped accepting new customers on April 30, 2026
  • AWS does not plan to add new features
  • Usage-based, region-dependent charges can be harder to forecast
Our verdict

IBM Cloud Code Engine is managed serverless compute for developers and teams who want to run container-based workloads without managing container clusters. It can deploy container images or build them from source, and it also runs batch…

Read the review →

AWS App Runner is a managed service for building, deploying, and running web applications and APIs from source code or container images. It handles deployments, load balancing, encrypted application traffic, and scaling, with options to…

Read the review →
  1. IBM Code EngineDocker Hosting 8.9Free plan
  2. AWS App RunnerDocker Hosting 8.5Paid

Strengths and trade-offs

  • IBM Code Engine — where it wins

    • Runs applications, batch jobs, and event-triggered functions.
    • Scales workloads to zero when idle and supports parallel fleets.
    • Connects to IBM Cloud services through service bindings.

    Where it doesn't

    • Usage-based charges can vary with resource and HTTP-call consumption.
    • Focuses on managed serverless compute, not conventional website hosting.
    • Its service integrations center on IBM Cloud and a narrower ecosystem.

  • AWS App Runner — where it wins

    • Deploys from source code or container images
    • Automatically scales active instances and load balances applications
    • Supports encrypted traffic and private VPC connectivity

    Where it doesn't

    • Stopped accepting new customers on April 30, 2026
    • AWS does not plan to add new features
    • Usage-based, region-dependent charges can be harder to forecast

More options

More comparisons

All docker hosting comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update