Head-to-head · Rust Application Hosting
Hop vs Scalingo
Hop leads on 0 checks, Scalingo on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreHop · 9.4/10
- Free trialonly Scalingo
- Most featuresHop · 4 of 6
Hop scores higher on our rubric for rust application hosting: 9.4 against 8.3 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #8.
Hop is the better fit for rust teams wanting managed, direct Rust deployment. Scalingo is the better fit for european teams wanting conventional PaaS hosting.
- Hop fits best
Rust teams wanting managed, direct Rust deployment
- Scalingo fits best
European teams wanting conventional PaaS hosting
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Hop 9.4/10 Visit ↗ | Scalingo 8.3/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Ranking | #1 in Rust Application Hosting | #8 in Rust Application Hosting |
| Best for | Rust teams wanting managed, direct Rust deployment | European teams wanting conventional PaaS hosting |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Starting price | $2.10/GB/mo | €7.20/mo |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Free trial | — | 30 days |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web, Linux | Web |
| Integrations | 4 integrations | 2 integrations |
| Features Hop 4/6 · Scalingo 2/6 | ||
| Git deployment | ✓ (best) | Not checked yet |
| Docker deployment | ✓ (best) | Not checked yet |
| Persistent storage | ✓ (best) | Not checked yet |
| Managed databases | Not checked yet | ✓ (best) |
| Private networking | ✓ | ✓ |
| Background workers | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Specs | ||
| Rust toolchain control | Selectable | Not checked yet |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Hop is a cloud application deployment platform for developers running containerized applications. It supports Rust through automatic Nixpacks builds, custom Dockerfiles, and configurable Rust toolchain versions. Teams can deploy from… Read the review → |
Scalingo is a managed Platform as a Service for developers, technical teams, and organizations deploying web applications and APIs. Applications are built with buildpacks and run in containers, with features for scaling, managed databases,… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Hop — where it wins
- Automatic Rust builds with Nixpacks or custom Dockerfiles
- Autoscaling, health checks, persistent volumes, and private VPC networking
- Deploy from GitHub or OCI-compatible Docker images
Where it doesn't
- No free plan is listed
- Compute and memory are billed separately while active
- Advanced deployments may require Dockerfile or toolchain configuration
Scalingo — where it wins
- Git-based deployments with buildpacks, CLI, and API automation
- Autoscaling, managed databases, private networks, and review apps
- Automatic TLS, logs, metrics, and two deployment regions
Where it doesn't
- No free plan; paid hosting starts at €7.20 per container monthly
- SecNumCloud region access is restricted and available upon request
- The entry S plan provides 256 MB RAM and low CPU priority
- Hop9.4/10 · Paid
A paid deployment platform with direct Rust builds, scaling, networking, and storage.
Visit HopFull verdict → - Scalingo8.3/10 · 30-day trial
A conventional European PaaS with Git deployment, autoscaling, databases, and private networks.
Visit ScalingoFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Hop vs Fermyon Spin
- Hop vs Fly.io
- Hop vs Railway
- Hop vs Render
- Hop vs Koyeb
- Hop vs Northflank
- Fermyon Spin vs Scalingo
- Koyeb vs Scalingo
All rust application hosting comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update






