Head-to-head · Kubernetes Ingress Controllers
HAProxy Ingress vs LiteSpeed Ingress Controller
HAProxy Ingress leads on 1 check, LiteSpeed Ingress Controller on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreHAProxy Ingress · 8.9/10
- Free planonly HAProxy Ingress
- Free trialonly LiteSpeed Ingress Controller
HAProxy Ingress scores higher on our rubric for kubernetes ingress controllers: 8.9 against 8.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #14.
HAProxy Ingress offers free plan; LiteSpeed Ingress Controller doesn't.
HAProxy Ingress is the better fit for teams needing full-featured Kubernetes ingress. LiteSpeed Ingress Controller is the better fit for paid teams wanting comprehensive ingress controls.
- HAProxy Ingress fits best
Teams needing full-featured Kubernetes ingress
- LiteSpeed Ingress Controller fits best
Paid teams wanting comprehensive ingress controls
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | HAProxy Ingress 8.9/10 Visit ↗ | LiteSpeed Ingress Controller 8.0/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 8.9 | 8.0 |
| Ranking | #5 in Kubernetes Ingress Controllers | #14 in Kubernetes Ingress Controllers |
| Best for | Teams needing full-featured Kubernetes ingress | Paid teams wanting comprehensive ingress controls |
| Pricing model | Free | Paid |
| Starting price | Free plan | $715/yr |
| Free plan | ✓ (best) | — |
| Free trial | — | 15 days |
| Deployment | Self-hosted | Self-hosted, Cloud |
| Platforms | Linux | Linux |
| Support | Community, Docs | Email, Tickets, Community, Docs |
| Integrations | 6 integrations | 4 integrations |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features HAProxy Ingress 5/5 · LiteSpeed Ingress Controller 5/5 | ||
| TLS automation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Canary routing | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rate limiting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web application firewall | ✓ | ✓ |
| Auth policies | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Ingress API model | Both | Both |
| Deployment model | Self-hosted | Self-hosted |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | HAProxy Ingress is an open-source Kubernetes ingress controller for routing external HTTP, HTTPS, and TCP traffic to applications running in a cluster. It fits teams that want broad traffic-management capabilities while keeping deployment… Read the review → |
LiteSpeed Ingress Controller is a self-hosted Kubernetes application delivery controller and load balancer built on the LiteSpeed Web ADC engine. It is intended for teams running Kubernetes infrastructure that need licensed ingress… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
HAProxy Ingress — where it wins
- Supports both Kubernetes Ingress resources and Gateway API
- Automates ACME certificate issuance and renewal
- Adds canary routing, rate limits, authentication, and WAF integrations
Where it doesn't
- Self-hosted deployment requires Kubernetes and Linux infrastructure
- HAProxy-based configuration may be more than simple ingress needs
- Commercial pricing and managed hosting are not part of the offering
LiteSpeed Ingress Controller — where it wins
- Supports both Kubernetes Ingress resources and Gateway API resources
- Combines TLS automation, canary routing, WAF, throttling, and authentication
- Handles HTTP/2, HTTP/3, QUIC, and Kubernetes service load balancing
Where it doesn't
- No permanent free plan is available
- Requires a self-hosted deployment on Linux
- Uses a licensed Web ADC engine rather than an open-source model
- HAProxy Ingress8.9/10 · Free plan
A broad, self-hosted ingress option with Ingress and Gateway API support.
Try HAProxy IngressFull verdict → - LiteSpeed Ingress Controller8.0/10 · 15-day trial
A paid, self-hosted controller with broad Kubernetes traffic, security, and protocol controls.
Visit LiteSpeedFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Traefik Proxy vs HAProxy Ingress
- NGINX Ingress Controller vs HAProxy Ingress
- Kong Ingress Controller vs HAProxy Ingress
- Contour vs HAProxy Ingress
- HAProxy Ingress vs kgateway
- HAProxy Ingress vs Apache APISIX
- HAProxy Ingress vs Envoy Gateway
All kubernetes ingress controllers comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update








