Google Cloud Run vs Heroku

Google Cloud Run9.3Visit Heroku8.9Visit

Higher score Google Cloud Run #2 in Managed Cloud Hosting 9.3/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 2 features Visit Google Cloud

vs

Heroku #6 in Managed Cloud Hosting 8.9/10 Paid ✓ 0 of 2 features Visit Heroku

• Google Cloud Run fits best

  Serverless container applications

• Heroku fits best

  Mature platform application hosting

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature	Google Cloud Run 9.3/10 Visit ↗	Heroku 8.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	9.3	8.9
Ranking	#2 in Managed Cloud Hosting	#6 in Managed Cloud Hosting
Best for	Serverless container applications	Mature platform application hosting
Pricing model	Free plan + paid	Paid
Starting price	Free plan	$5/unit/mo
Free plan	✓ (best)	—
Free trial	—	—
Deployment	Cloud	Cloud
Platforms	Web	Web
Support	Docs	Email, Tickets, Community, Docs
Compliance	SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS	SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS
Integrations	7 integrations	200+ integrations
Built for	Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise	Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Google Cloud Run 0/2 · Heroku 0/2
Staging sites	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Free migration	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Specs
Backup retention	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Included storage	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Included bandwidth	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Support coverage	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Our review
Pros	Automatic scaling with scale-to-zero behavior Services, jobs, worker pools, and long-lived instances Built-in HTTPS, rollouts, IAM, and private networking options	Git, GitHub, Docker, and CI-based deployment Pipelines, Review Apps, release history, and rollback Managed data services, APIs, and extensive logging
Cons	Regional, usage-based pricing requires usage-based cost planning No fixed monthly plan structure Its core model centers on containerized workloads	No free plan Eco dynos sleep after 30 minutes of inactivity Self-hosted deployment is not supported
Our verdict	Google Cloud Run is a fully managed, serverless application platform for developers and teams running containerized workloads. It supports web applications, APIs, event-driven processing, batch workloads, and AI inference. Teams can deploy… Read the review →	Heroku is a managed platform as a service for developers and teams building, deploying, running, and scaling web applications and APIs. Applications run in managed dynos, with deployment options spanning Git, GitHub, Docker, and continuous… Read the review →

Strengths and trade-offs

• Google Cloud Run — where it wins

  • Automatic scaling with scale-to-zero behavior
  • Services, jobs, worker pools, and long-lived instances
  • Built-in HTTPS, rollouts, IAM, and private networking options

  Where it doesn't

  • Regional, usage-based pricing requires usage-based cost planning
  • No fixed monthly plan structure
  • Its core model centers on containerized workloads

• Heroku — where it wins

  • Git, GitHub, Docker, and CI-based deployment
  • Pipelines, Review Apps, release history, and rollback
  • Managed data services, APIs, and extensive logging

  Where it doesn't

  • No free plan
  • Eco dynos sleep after 30 minutes of inactivity
  • Self-hosted deployment is not supported

• Google Cloud Run9.3/10 · Free plan

  A strong fit for containerized web, API, event-driven, batch, and AI workloads.

  Visit Google CloudFull verdict →
• Heroku8.9/10 · Paid

  A mature managed runtime for teams deploying web applications and APIs.

  Visit HerokuFull verdict →