Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Infrastructure Monitoring

Google Cloud Monitoring vs Azure Monitor

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score Google Cloud Monitoring #5 in Infrastructure Monitoring 9.0/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 2 of 3 features Visit Google Cloud

Google Cloud Monitoring leads on 2 checks, Azure Monitor on 0, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreGoogle Cloud Monitoring · 9.0/10
  • Free planonly Google Cloud Monitoring

Google Cloud Monitoring scores higher on our rubric for infrastructure monitoring: 9.0 against 8.3 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #12.

Google Cloud Monitoring offers free plan; Azure Monitor doesn't. Google Cloud Monitoring offers service monitoring; Azure Monitor doesn't.

Google Cloud Monitoring is the better fit for google Cloud environments. Azure Monitor is the better fit for azure-centric infrastructure teams.

  • Google Cloud Monitoring fits best

    Google Cloud environments

  • Azure Monitor fits best

    Azure-centric infrastructure teams

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Google Cloud Monitoring 9.0/10 Visit ↗ Azure Monitor 8.3/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 8.3
Ranking #5 in Infrastructure Monitoring #12 in Infrastructure Monitoring
Best for Google Cloud environments Azure-centric infrastructure teams
Pricing model Free plan + paid Paid
Starting price Free plan Not checked yet
Free plan ✓ (best) —
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Support Community Docs
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Google Cloud Monitoring 2/3 · Azure Monitor 2/3
VM monitoring ✓ ✓
Service monitoring ✓ (best) —
Agentless monitoring Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Specs
Included hosts Not checked yet Not checked yet
Metrics retention Custom Custom
Deployment model Cloud Cloud
OS coverage Linux and windows Linux and windows
Our review
Pros
  • Dashboards, alerts, uptime checks, synthetics, and SLO monitoring
  • Native coverage for Google Cloud, Compute Engine, GKE, and Cloud Run
  • Supports Prometheus, custom metrics, multicloud scopes, and logging integration
  • Covers metrics, logs, traces, events, VMs, Kubernetes, and Prometheus
  • Combines Log Analytics, KQL, diagnostics, dashboards, and alerts
  • Extends monitoring across hybrid and multicloud environments through Azure Arc
Cons
  • Usage-based pricing is less predictable than fixed-plan billing
  • Its strongest ecosystem fit is centered on Google Cloud services
  • No free plan is available
  • Consumption-based pricing can be harder to forecast than fixed plans
  • Azure-focused integrations may be less suitable for non-Azure-first teams
  • The broad feature set can require planning across multiple monitoring components
Our verdict

Google Cloud Monitoring is a managed observability service for tracking application and infrastructure performance, availability, and health. It is designed for teams running workloads across Google Cloud, hybrid environments, and selected…

Read the review →

Azure Monitor is Microsoft's cloud observability service for applications, infrastructure, networks, and hybrid environments. It collects metrics, logs, traces, and events from Azure resources, virtual machines, guest operating systems,…

Read the review →
  1. Google Cloud MonitoringInfrastructure Monitoring 9.0Free plan
  2. Azure MonitorInfrastructure Monitoring 8.3Paid

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Google Cloud Monitoring — where it wins

    • Dashboards, alerts, uptime checks, synthetics, and SLO monitoring
    • Native coverage for Google Cloud, Compute Engine, GKE, and Cloud Run
    • Supports Prometheus, custom metrics, multicloud scopes, and logging integration

    Where it doesn't

    • Usage-based pricing is less predictable than fixed-plan billing
    • Its strongest ecosystem fit is centered on Google Cloud services
    • No free plan is available
  • Azure Monitor — where it wins

    • Covers metrics, logs, traces, events, VMs, Kubernetes, and Prometheus
    • Combines Log Analytics, KQL, diagnostics, dashboards, and alerts
    • Extends monitoring across hybrid and multicloud environments through Azure Arc

    Where it doesn't

    • Consumption-based pricing can be harder to forecast than fixed plans
    • Azure-focused integrations may be less suitable for non-Azure-first teams
    • The broad feature set can require planning across multiple monitoring components

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update