Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Core Keeper Server Hosting

Godlike.Host vs WinterNode Core Keeper Hosting

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 8 checks side by side
Higher score Godlike.Host #1 in Core Keeper Server Hosting 9.7/10 Paid Free planFree trial✓ 3 of 4 features Visit Godlike.host

Godlike.Host leads on 2 checks, WinterNode Core Keeper Hosting on 2, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 8 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreGodlike.Host · 9.7/10
  • Lowest starting priceGodlike.Host · $3.99/mo
  • Free planonly Godlike.Host
  • Free trialonly Godlike.Host

Godlike.Host scores higher on our rubric for core keeper server hosting: 9.7 against 9.1 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #4.

Godlike.Host is cheaper to start at $3.99/mo against $7.96/mo. WinterNode Core Keeper Hosting leads on player slots: 8 players versus 4 players. WinterNode Core Keeper Hosting leads on ram: 2 GB versus 1 GB. Godlike.Host leads on server locations: 10 locations versus 9 locations.

WinterNode Core Keeper Hosting is the better fit for players prioritizing backup retention.

  • WinterNode Core Keeper Hosting fits best

    Players prioritizing backup retention

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Godlike.Host 9.7/10 Visit ↗ WinterNode Core Keeper Hosting 9.1/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.7 9.1
Ranking #1 in Core Keeper Server Hosting #4 in Core Keeper Server Hosting
Best for — Players prioritizing backup retention
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price $3.99/mo (best) $7.96/mo
Free plan ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Free trial ✓ —
Features Godlike.Host 3/4 · WinterNode Core Keeper Hosting 3/4
Automatic backups ✓ ✓
Mod support ✓ ✓
Cross-play support Not checked yet Not checked yet
DDoS protection ✓ ✓
Specs
Player slots 4 players 8 players (best)
RAM 1 GB 2 GB (best)
Server locations 10 locations (best) 9 locations
Our review
Pros —
  • Automatic backups every 12 hours with 45-day retention
  • Steam Workshop support and existing world uploads
  • DDoS protection across nine global server locations
Cons —
  • Only one listed hosting plan
  • NVMe storage and MySQL databases require a request
  • Provider documents support for groups of up to eight players
Our verdict

—

Read the review →

WinterNode Core Keeper Hosting provides persistent 24/7 servers for Core Keeper communities that want a managed environment rather than local hosting. The service supports web, Windows, Linux, PC, and Steam Deck access, with configurable…

Read the review →
  1. Godlike.HostCore Keeper Server Hosting 9.7Paid
  2. WinterNode Core Keeper HostingCore Keeper Server Hosting 9.1Paid

Strengths and trade-offs

  • WinterNode Core Keeper Hosting — where it wins

    • Automatic backups every 12 hours with 45-day retention
    • Steam Workshop support and existing world uploads
    • DDoS protection across nine global server locations

    Where it doesn't

    • Only one listed hosting plan
    • NVMe storage and MySQL databases require a request
    • Provider documents support for groups of up to eight players

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update