Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · DevSecOps Platforms

GitHub Advanced Security vs Black Duck Polaris

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score GitHub Advanced Security #6 in DevSecOps Platforms 8.7/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 6 features Visit GitHub
Black Duck Polaris #8 in DevSecOps Platforms 8.4/10 Pricing on request ✓ 5 of 6 features Visit Black Duck

GitHub Advanced Security leads on 0 checks, Black Duck Polaris on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreGitHub Advanced Security · 8.7/10
  • Free planonly GitHub Advanced Security
  • Most featuresBlack Duck Polaris · 5 of 6

GitHub Advanced Security scores higher on our rubric for devsecops platforms: 8.7 against 8.4 out of 10; our editors rank them #6 and #8.

On deployment model, GitHub Advanced Security gives you Hybrid where Black Duck Polaris offers Cloud.

GitHub Advanced Security is the better fit for gitHub-centered development organizations. Black Duck Polaris is the better fit for cloud AppSec with strong lifecycle governance.

  • GitHub Advanced Security fits best

    GitHub-centered development organizations

  • Black Duck Polaris fits best

    Cloud AppSec with strong lifecycle governance

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature GitHub Advanced Security 8.7/10 Visit ↗ Black Duck Polaris 8.4/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.7 8.4
Ranking #6 in DevSecOps Platforms #8 in DevSecOps Platforms
Best for GitHub-centered development organizations Cloud AppSec with strong lifecycle governance
Pricing model Free plan + paid Paid
Starting price $19/user/mo Pricing on request
Free plan ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Support Email, Phone, Tickets, Community, Docs Community, Docs
Compliance SOC 2, SSO/SAML, 2FA SOC 2, ISO 27001
Integrations 3 integrations 9 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features GitHub Advanced Security 3/6 · Black Duck Polaris 5/6
IaC scanning Not checked yet Not checked yet
Container scanning Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Policy as code Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Remediation workflows ✓ ✓
SBOM management ✓ ✓
Compliance reporting ✓ ✓
Specs
Deployment model Hybrid Cloud
Our review
Pros
  • CodeQL scanning, third-party SARIF uploads, and Copilot Autofix
  • Secret scanning, push protection, and dependency security
  • Security campaigns, SBOM export, audit logs, and compliance reports
  • Combines SAST, SCA, DAST, container analysis, and SBOM reporting
  • Policy enforcement supports notifications, build breaking, and fix-by dates
  • Integrates with major SCM, CI/CD, issue-tracking, CLI, and API tools
Cons
  • Paid licensing applies to private and enterprise repositories
  • Strongest fit requires development workflows centered on GitHub
  • Capabilities are divided across two separately priced plans
  • Pricing is handled through contact sales
  • Cloud deployment may not suit teams requiring self-hosted infrastructure
  • Its stated scope centers on application security rather than dedicated IaC workflows
Our verdict

GitHub Advanced Security is GitHub’s application-security offering for development teams and organizations. It combines GitHub Secret Protection and GitHub Code Security within GitHub workflows, covering code scanning, secret detection,…

Read the review →

Black Duck Polaris is a cloud-based application security platform for development, security, and DevSecOps teams. It brings together static application security testing, software composition analysis, dynamic application security testing,…

Read the review →
  1. GitHub Advanced SecurityDevSecOps Platforms 8.7Free plan
  2. Black Duck PolarisDevSecOps Platforms 8.4Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • GitHub Advanced Security — where it wins

    • CodeQL scanning, third-party SARIF uploads, and Copilot Autofix
    • Secret scanning, push protection, and dependency security
    • Security campaigns, SBOM export, audit logs, and compliance reports

    Where it doesn't

    • Paid licensing applies to private and enterprise repositories
    • Strongest fit requires development workflows centered on GitHub
    • Capabilities are divided across two separately priced plans
  • Black Duck Polaris — where it wins

    • Combines SAST, SCA, DAST, container analysis, and SBOM reporting
    • Policy enforcement supports notifications, build breaking, and fix-by dates
    • Integrates with major SCM, CI/CD, issue-tracking, CLI, and API tools

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing is handled through contact sales
    • Cloud deployment may not suit teams requiring self-hosted infrastructure
    • Its stated scope centers on application security rather than dedicated IaC workflows
  • GitHub Advanced Security8.7/10 · Free plan

    A GitHub-native DevSecOps suite covering code, secrets, dependencies, and remediation.

    Visit GitHubFull verdict →
  • Black Duck Polaris8.4/10 · Pricing on request

    A broad cloud AppSec platform with strong governance, integrations, and remediation workflows.

    Visit Black DuckFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update