Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Static Site Generators

Gatsby vs Cecil

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score Gatsby #1 in Static Site Generators 9.4/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Gatsby
Cecil #4 in Static Site Generators 8.9/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 4 features Visit Cecil

Gatsby leads on 0 checks, Cecil on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreGatsby · 9.4/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresGatsby · 4 of 4

Gatsby scores higher on our rubric for static site generators: 9.4 against 8.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #4.

On content sources, Gatsby gives you Api where Cecil offers Markdown.

Gatsby is the better fit for CMS-heavy React sites. Cecil is the better fit for PHP static sites.

  • Gatsby fits best

    CMS-heavy React sites

  • Cecil fits best

    PHP static sites

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Gatsby 9.4/10 Visit ↗ Cecil 8.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.4 8.9
Ranking #1 in Static Site Generators #4 in Static Site Generators
Best for CMS-heavy React sites PHP static sites
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Self-hosted
Platforms Web Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Community, Docs Docs
Integrations 8 integrations 8 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market
Features Gatsby 4/4 · Cecil 3/4
CMS integration ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Incremental builds ✓ ✓
Multilingual support ✓ ✓
Local preview server ✓ ✓
Specs
Content sources Api Markdown
Supported languages JavaScript, Node.js PHP
Our review
Pros
  • GraphQL data layer connects files, APIs, CMSs, databases, and services
  • Supports static generation, SSR, DSG, and incremental builds
  • Integrates with major CMSs, Shopify, and multilingual routing options
  • Incremental builds reduce work for changed pages and dependent templates.
  • Multilingual content, translations, taxonomies, RSS, and pagination are built in.
  • Responsive images support WebP and AVIF output alongside SEO helpers.
Cons
  • Requires JavaScript and Node.js development
  • The broad feature set adds architectural choices for smaller sites
  • Gatsby Cloud and Netlify Cloud are directing users to migrate to Netlify
  • The supported language is PHP.
  • It does not include AI features.
  • Its output is static, without a database or server-side runtime.
Our verdict

Gatsby is an open-source, React-based framework for building websites and web applications. It generates static assets at build time, combines content from filesystems, APIs, CMSs, databases, and other services, and exposes that…

Read the review →

Cecil is an open-source, command-line static site generator written in PHP. It turns Markdown and plain-text content, images, and Twig templates into static websites without a database or server-side runtime. The project is aimed at…

Read the review →
  1. GatsbyStatic Site Generators 9.4Free plan
  2. CecilStatic Site Generators 8.9Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Gatsby — where it wins

    • GraphQL data layer connects files, APIs, CMSs, databases, and services
    • Supports static generation, SSR, DSG, and incremental builds
    • Integrates with major CMSs, Shopify, and multilingual routing options

    Where it doesn't

    • Requires JavaScript and Node.js development
    • The broad feature set adds architectural choices for smaller sites
    • Gatsby Cloud and Netlify Cloud are directing users to migrate to Netlify
  • Cecil — where it wins

    • Incremental builds reduce work for changed pages and dependent templates.
    • Multilingual content, translations, taxonomies, RSS, and pagination are built in.
    • Responsive images support WebP and AVIF output alongside SEO helpers.

    Where it doesn't

    • The supported language is PHP.
    • It does not include AI features.
    • Its output is static, without a database or server-side runtime.

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update