Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Performance Testing Software

Gatling vs Taurus

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score Gatling #8 in Performance Testing Software 8.7/10 Free plan · 14-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 4 of 5 features Visit Gatling
Taurus #14 in Performance Testing Software 7.9/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 4 of 5 features Visit Taurus

Gatling leads on 0 checks, Taurus on 1, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreGatling · 8.7/10
  • Free planboth
  • Free trialonly Gatling

Gatling scores higher on our rubric for performance testing software: 8.7 against 7.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #8 and #14.

Taurus offers browser-based testing; Gatling doesn't.

Gatling is the better fit for teams needing broad, scalable protocol testing. Taurus is the better fit for open-source users orchestrating multiple engines.

  • Gatling fits best

    Teams needing broad, scalable protocol testing

  • Taurus fits best

    Open-source users orchestrating multiple engines

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Gatling 8.7/10 Visit ↗ Taurus 7.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.7 7.9
Ranking #8 in Performance Testing Software #14 in Performance Testing Software
Best for Teams needing broad, scalable protocol testing Open-source users orchestrating multiple engines
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free
Starting price €89/mo Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial 14 days —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted, Desktop Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web, Windows, macOS, Linux Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Live chat, Community, Docs Community, Docs
Integrations 20 integrations 8 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Gatling 4/5 · Taurus 4/5
Load testing ✓ ✓
Stress testing ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Browser-based testing — ✓ (best)
Distributed load ✓ ✓
API testing ✓ ✓
Specs
Deployment model Hybrid Hybrid
Max virtual users 60000 users Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Supports HTTP, WebSocket, SSE, JMS, MQTT, and gRPC testing
  • Distributed testing supports up to 60,000 virtual users on Basic
  • Integrates with major CI/CD, observability, and collaboration tools
  • One YAML workflow can coordinate JMeter, Gatling, Locust, k6, and BlazeMeter.
  • Supports API, HTTP, Selenium, and Playwright test execution.
  • Runs locally, in Docker, across workers, or through cloud provisioning.
Cons
  • Browser sessions generate HTTP scenarios rather than executing JavaScript
  • Basic limits testing to 1 hour and one load generator
  • Advanced limits and support require higher-tier or custom plans
  • The workflow is centered on YAML configuration and command-line execution.
  • Reporting focuses on console and interactive results.
  • Cloud-provisioned execution runs through BlazeMeter.
Our verdict

Gatling is a performance-testing platform for developers, QA teams, and enterprises testing web applications, APIs, microservices, and cloud infrastructure. Its open-source Community Edition runs code-based scenarios locally, while the…

Read the review →

Taurus is an open-source framework for performance and functional test automation. It is aimed at engineering teams that want one YAML-based configuration layer and command-line workflow across multiple testing engines. Users can define…

Read the review →
  1. GatlingPerformance Testing Software 8.7Free plan · 14-day trial
  2. TaurusPerformance Testing Software 7.9Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Gatling — where it wins

    • Supports HTTP, WebSocket, SSE, JMS, MQTT, and gRPC testing
    • Distributed testing supports up to 60,000 virtual users on Basic
    • Integrates with major CI/CD, observability, and collaboration tools

    Where it doesn't

    • Browser sessions generate HTTP scenarios rather than executing JavaScript
    • Basic limits testing to 1 hour and one load generator
    • Advanced limits and support require higher-tier or custom plans
  • Taurus — where it wins

    • One YAML workflow can coordinate JMeter, Gatling, Locust, k6, and BlazeMeter.
    • Supports API, HTTP, Selenium, and Playwright test execution.
    • Runs locally, in Docker, across workers, or through cloud provisioning.

    Where it doesn't

    • The workflow is centered on YAML configuration and command-line execution.
    • Reporting focuses on console and interactive results.
    • Cloud-provisioned execution runs through BlazeMeter.
  • Gatling8.7/10 · Free plan · 14-day trial

    A broad performance-testing platform with code, no-code, and distributed load options.

    Visit GatlingFull verdict →
  • Taurus7.9/10 · Free plan

    A free, open-source YAML layer for orchestrating diverse performance and browser-testing engines.

    Visit TaurusFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update