Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Performance Testing Software

Gatling vs LoadFocus

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 7 checks side by side
Higher score Gatling #8 in Performance Testing Software 8.7/10 Free plan · 14-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 4 of 5 features Visit Gatling
LoadFocus #11 in Performance Testing Software 8.3/10 Free plan · 7-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 5 of 5 features Visit LoadFocus

Gatling leads on 1 check, LoadFocus on 1, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 7 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreGatling · 8.7/10
  • Free planboth
  • Free trialboth
  • Most featuresLoadFocus · 5 of 5

Gatling scores higher on our rubric for performance testing software: 8.7 against 8.3 out of 10; our editors rank them #8 and #11.

LoadFocus offers browser-based testing; Gatling doesn't. On deployment model, Gatling gives you Hybrid where LoadFocus offers Cloud. Gatling leads on max virtual users: 60000 users versus 250 users.

Gatling is the better fit for teams needing broad, scalable protocol testing. LoadFocus is the better fit for small teams wanting affordable cloud testing.

  • Gatling fits best

    Teams needing broad, scalable protocol testing

  • LoadFocus fits best

    Small teams wanting affordable cloud testing

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Gatling 8.7/10 Visit ↗ LoadFocus 8.3/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.7 8.3
Ranking #8 in Performance Testing Software #11 in Performance Testing Software
Best for Teams needing broad, scalable protocol testing Small teams wanting affordable cloud testing
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price €89/mo $19/mo
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial 14 days 7 days
Free trial length 14 days · no card needed 7 days · no card needed
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted, Desktop Cloud, Browser extension
Platforms Web, Windows, macOS, Linux Web, Chrome extension
Support Live chat, Community, Docs Email, Live chat, Docs
Compliance SOC 2, GDPR, SSO/SAML GDPR
Integrations 20 integrations 30+ integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Gatling 4/5 · LoadFocus 5/5
Load testing ✓ ✓
Stress testing ✓ ✓
Browser-based testing — ✓ (best)
Distributed load ✓ ✓
API testing ✓ ✓
Specs
Deployment model Hybrid Cloud
Max virtual users 60000 users (best) 250 users
Our review
Pros
  • Supports HTTP, WebSocket, SSE, JMS, MQTT, and gRPC testing
  • Distributed testing supports up to 60,000 virtual users on Basic
  • Integrates with major CI/CD, observability, and collaboration tools
  • Free plan includes HTTP, JMeter, and k6 load testing
  • Runs tests from 25+ cloud locations on paid tiers
  • Connects with Datadog, New Relic, Dynatrace, and Jenkins
Cons
  • Browser sessions generate HTTP scenarios rather than executing JavaScript
  • Basic limits testing to 1 hour and one load generator
  • Advanced limits and support require higher-tier or custom plans
  • Free tests are limited to 10 concurrent users and 60 seconds
  • Starter is capped at 250 concurrent users
  • Higher test capacity requires paid monthly plans
Our verdict

Gatling is a performance-testing platform for developers, QA teams, and enterprises testing web applications, APIs, microservices, and cloud infrastructure. Its open-source Community Edition runs code-based scenarios locally, while the…

Read the review →

LoadFocus is a cloud-based performance testing platform for software developers, QA engineers, SDETs, DevOps teams, and product owners. It covers HTTP load testing for websites and APIs, Apache JMeter and k6 execution, browser checks with…

Read the review →
  1. GatlingPerformance Testing Software 8.7Free plan · 14-day trial
  2. LoadFocusPerformance Testing Software 8.3Free plan · 7-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Gatling — where it wins

    • Supports HTTP, WebSocket, SSE, JMS, MQTT, and gRPC testing
    • Distributed testing supports up to 60,000 virtual users on Basic
    • Integrates with major CI/CD, observability, and collaboration tools

    Where it doesn't

    • Browser sessions generate HTTP scenarios rather than executing JavaScript
    • Basic limits testing to 1 hour and one load generator
    • Advanced limits and support require higher-tier or custom plans
  • LoadFocus — where it wins

    • Free plan includes HTTP, JMeter, and k6 load testing
    • Runs tests from 25+ cloud locations on paid tiers
    • Connects with Datadog, New Relic, Dynatrace, and Jenkins

    Where it doesn't

    • Free tests are limited to 10 concurrent users and 60 seconds
    • Starter is capped at 250 concurrent users
    • Higher test capacity requires paid monthly plans
  • Gatling8.7/10 · Free plan · 14-day trial

    A broad performance-testing platform with code, no-code, and distributed load options.

    Visit GatlingFull verdict →
  • LoadFocus8.3/10 · Free plan · 7-day trial

    Affordable cloud performance testing with JMeter, k6, browser checks, and CI/CD thresholds.

    Visit LoadFocusFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update