Head-to-head · File Manager Software
Files vs ForkLift
Files leads on 1 check, ForkLift on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreFiles · 7.3/10
- Free planonly Files
Files scores higher on our rubric for file manager software: 7.3 against 6.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #17 and #23.
Files offers free plan; ForkLift doesn't.
Files is the better fit for windows users wanting a modern free manager. ForkLift is the better fit for mac power users and small businesses.
- Files fits best
Windows users wanting a modern free manager
- ForkLift fits best
Mac power users and small businesses
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Files 7.3/10 Visit ↗ | ForkLift 6.7/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 7.3 | 6.7 |
| Ranking | #17 in File Manager Software | #23 in File Manager Software |
| Best for | Windows users wanting a modern free manager | Mac power users and small businesses |
| Pricing model | Free plan + paid | Paid |
| Starting price | Free plan | $19.95 one-time |
| Free plan | ✓ (best) | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Platforms | Windows | macOS |
| Support | Community, Docs | Email, Docs |
| Integrations | 20 integrations | 13 integrations |
| Built for | Solo, Small business, Mid-market | Solo, Small business, Mid-market |
| Features Files 5/6 · ForkLift 5/6 | ||
| Dual-pane view | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tabbed interface | ✓ | ✓ |
| Batch rename | ✓ | ✓ |
| Archive support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cloud storage access | ✓ | ✓ |
| Portable version | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Specs | ||
| Supported platforms | windows | macos |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Files is an open-source desktop file manager for Windows, aimed at users who want more structure and control than a basic folder browser. Its free version combines tabbed navigation, dual-pane folder management, multiple layouts, file and… Read the review → |
ForkLift is a macOS file manager and file-transfer client built for people who manage local files alongside remote servers, cloud storage, and network shares. Its dual-pane layout supports copying and organizing across locations, while… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Files — where it wins
- Dual panes, tabs, layouts, previews, and a Command Palette
- Batch renaming plus ZIP and 7z archive management
- Supports many cloud-drive clients and includes Git actions
Where it doesn't
- Windows-only availability
- Cloud access depends on supported desktop clients
- No AI features or cross-platform version
ForkLift — where it wins
- Broad remote, cloud, and network connection support
- Powerful search, synchronization, and batch-renaming tools
- Git actions, remote editing, archives, tags, and workspaces
Where it doesn't
- Available only for macOS
- No free plan
- Included updates end after one or two years
- Files7.3/10 · Free plan
A free, flexible Windows manager with tabs, dual panes, archives, previews, and cloud access.
Visit FilesFull verdict → - ForkLift6.7/10 · Paid
A capable Mac file manager for local, remote, cloud, and Git-based workflows.
Visit ForkLiftFull verdict →
All file manager software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update