Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Proxmox Hosting

fibranode Private Cloud vs IMT-Systems Proxmox Cluster

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 2 checks side by side
Higher score fibranode Private Cloud #3 in Proxmox Hosting 9.0/10 Pricing on request ✓ 2 of 2 features Visit fibranode
IMT-Systems Proxmox Cluster #8 in Proxmox Hosting 8.2/10 Pricing on request ✓ 1 of 2 features Visit IMT-Systems

fibranode Private Cloud leads on 1 check, IMT-Systems Proxmox Cluster on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scorefibranode Private Cloud · 9.0/10
  • Most featuresfibranode Private Cloud · 2 of 2

fibranode Private Cloud scores higher on our rubric for proxmox hosting: 9.0 against 8.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #8.

fibranode Private Cloud offers backups included; IMT-Systems Proxmox Cluster doesn't. On storage type, fibranode Private Cloud gives you Mixed where IMT-Systems Proxmox Cluster offers Ssd.

fibranode Private Cloud is the better fit for managed clusters needing automation integrations. IMT-Systems Proxmox Cluster is the better fit for teams needing directory and Terraform integration.

  • fibranode Private Cloud fits best

    Managed clusters needing automation integrations

  • IMT-Systems Proxmox Cluster fits best

    Teams needing directory and Terraform integration

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature fibranode Private Cloud 9.0/10 Visit ↗ IMT-Systems Proxmox Cluster 8.2/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 8.2
Ranking #3 in Proxmox Hosting #8 in Proxmox Hosting
Best for Managed clusters needing automation integrations Teams needing directory and Terraform integration
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request —
Free plan Not checked yet Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Support Email, Tickets · 24/7 Email, Phone · 24/7
Compliance ISO 27001 SOC 2, GDPR, PCI DSS, ISO 27001
Integrations 2 integrations 4 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features fibranode Private Cloud 2/2 · IMT-Systems Proxmox Cluster 1/2
Backups included ✓ (best) —
Web console access ✓ ✓
Specs
Management level Managed Not checked yet
Backup retention Not checked yet Not checked yet
Included RAM Not checked yet 1024 GB
Storage type Mixed Ssd
Our review
Pros
  • High availability with Ceph triple replication and live migration
  • Encrypted, deduplicated backups with selectable retention
  • Terraform and Ansible integrations plus REST API access
  • High availability with live migration and automated VM failover
  • Ceph storage scales from 10 TB to 150 TB
  • LDAP, Active Directory, REST and Terraform integration
Cons
  • Pricing and configuration require a tailored vendor quote
  • High availability starts at three hypervisor nodes
  • Dedicated infrastructure may be more than smaller workloads need
  • Pricing requires an individual quote
  • Proxmox Backup Server is optional rather than included
  • The entry plan uses two nodes, while others use three
Our verdict

fibranode Private Cloud provides managed Proxmox VE clusters on dedicated hardware operated from fibranode data centres. It combines KVM and LXC virtualization with high-availability clusters, Ceph storage, software-defined networking,…

Read the review →

IMT-Systems Proxmox Cluster is a hosted, dedicated Proxmox VE service for medium-sized and large enterprises. Clusters run in Frankfurt am Main data centers and combine Proxmox high-availability clustering, live migration, Ceph distributed…

Read the review →
  1. fibranode Private CloudProxmox Hosting 9.0Pricing on request
  2. IMT-Systems Proxmox ClusterProxmox Hosting 8.2Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • fibranode Private Cloud — where it wins

    • High availability with Ceph triple replication and live migration
    • Encrypted, deduplicated backups with selectable retention
    • Terraform and Ansible integrations plus REST API access

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing and configuration require a tailored vendor quote
    • High availability starts at three hypervisor nodes
    • Dedicated infrastructure may be more than smaller workloads need
  • IMT-Systems Proxmox Cluster — where it wins

    • High availability with live migration and automated VM failover
    • Ceph storage scales from 10 TB to 150 TB
    • LDAP, Active Directory, REST and Terraform integration

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires an individual quote
    • Proxmox Backup Server is optional rather than included
    • The entry plan uses two nodes, while others use three
  • fibranode Private Cloud9.0/10 · Pricing on request

    A managed Proxmox foundation for dedicated workloads that need automation and high availability.

    Visit fibranodeFull verdict →
  • IMT-Systems Proxmox Cluster8.2/10 · Pricing on request

    A dedicated Proxmox service with HA, Ceph storage and Terraform automation.

    Visit IMT-SystemsFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update