Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Game Build Automation Software

FASTBuild vs Pants

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side

FASTBuild leads on 0 checks, Pants on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreFASTBuild · 8.9/10
  • Free planonly Pants

FASTBuild scores higher on our rubric for game build automation software: 8.9 against 8.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #5.

FASTBuild is the better fit for native game teams needing fast compilation. Pants is the better fit for polyglot teams needing remote build execution.

  • FASTBuild fits best

    Native game teams needing fast compilation

  • Pants fits best

    Polyglot teams needing remote build execution

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature FASTBuild 8.9/10 Visit ↗ Pants 8.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.9 8.6
Ranking #2 in Game Build Automation Software #5 in Game Build Automation Software
Best for Native game teams needing fast compilation Polyglot teams needing remote build execution
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Open source Free plan
Free plan Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Free trial — —
Deployment Desktop, Self-hosted Desktop
Platforms Windows, macOS, Linux Linux, macOS, Windows
Support Community, Docs Community, Docs
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Specs
Parallel jobs Not checked yet Not checked yet
Runner model Not checked yet Not checked yet
Build platforms Not checked yet Not checked yet
Game engine support Not checked yet Not checked yet
Artifact storage Not checked yet Not checked yet
Source integrations Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Parallel and distributed compilation across network workers
  • Local and network build caching for repeated builds
  • Generates Visual Studio and Xcode projects
  • Infers dependencies from source-code imports
  • Combines local and remote caching with remote execution
  • Packages outputs as PEX files and Docker images
Cons
  • Configuration is defined through text-based BFF files
  • Distributed compilation requires network workers
  • Primarily focused on C/C++ libraries, executables, DLLs, and tests
  • Requires repository configuration to run
  • Remote execution depends on available build workers
  • Remote caching uses REAPI or other providers
Our verdict

FASTBuild is an open-source build system for Windows, Linux, and macOS. It is designed for independent developers and large studios working on desktop, mobile, console, and other software, with a particular fit for native game teams. The…

Read the review →

Pants is an open-source build system for codebases of all sizes, including monorepos that use multiple languages and frameworks. It supports Python, Go, Java, Scala, Kotlin, Shell, Docker and other ecosystems. Teams can use it for local…

Read the review →
  1. FASTBuildGame Build Automation Software 8.9Open source
  2. PantsGame Build Automation Software 8.6Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • FASTBuild — where it wins

    • Parallel and distributed compilation across network workers
    • Local and network build caching for repeated builds
    • Generates Visual Studio and Xcode projects

    Where it doesn't

    • Configuration is defined through text-based BFF files
    • Distributed compilation requires network workers
    • Primarily focused on C/C++ libraries, executables, DLLs, and tests
  • Pants — where it wins

    • Infers dependencies from source-code imports
    • Combines local and remote caching with remote execution
    • Packages outputs as PEX files and Docker images

    Where it doesn't

    • Requires repository configuration to run
    • Remote execution depends on available build workers
    • Remote caching uses REAPI or other providers

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update