Head-to-head · 3D Avatar Software
FaceGen vs UMA 3
FaceGen leads on 0 checks, UMA 3 on 2, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Free planonly UMA 3
- Most featuresUMA 3 · 3 of 4
FaceGen and UMA 3 score identically on our rubric (7.0 out of 10) for 3d avatar software; FaceGen sits at #6 and UMA 3 at #8 in our editorial ranking, so the choice comes down to fit.
UMA 3 offers free plan; FaceGen doesn't publish it. On avatar style, UMA 3 gives you Both where FaceGen offers Human. UMA 3 offers rigged exports; FaceGen doesn't publish it.
FaceGen is the better fit for specialized photographic 3D head generation. UMA 3 is the better fit for free runtime avatars in Unity.
- FaceGen fits best
Specialized photographic 3D head generation
- UMA 3 fits best
Free runtime avatars in Unity
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | FaceGen 7.0/10 Visit ↗ | UMA 3 7.0/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| Ranking | #6 in 3D Avatar Software | #8 in 3D Avatar Software |
| Best for | Specialized photographic 3D head generation | Free runtime avatars in Unity |
| Pricing model | Paid | Free |
| Starting price | Not published | Not published |
| Free plan | Not published | ✓ (best) |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Desktop | Self-hosted |
| Support | Email, Docs | Community, Docs |
| Integrations | 4 integrations | 3 integrations |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Solo, Small business, Mid-market |
| Features FaceGen 2/4 · UMA 3 3/4 | ||
| Rigged exports | Not published | ✓ (best) |
| Game engine export | ✓ | ✓ |
| Face tracking | Not published | Not published |
| Commercial use | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Avatar style | Human | Both |
| Export formats | DAE, FBX, 3DS, MA, LWO, OBJ, XSI, WRL, STL, PNG, JPEG, TGA, BMP | OBJ, FBX, ZTL, 3ds Max, Blend |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | FaceGen creates realistic 3D human head models from photographs, random generation, or 3D scan data. It is designed for artists, animators, game and avatar developers, 3D printing workflows, research tools, and software teams that need… Read the review → |
UMA 3 is an open avatar creation framework for Unity projects, aimed at game developers building customizable characters, crowds, multiplayer avatars, and reusable avatar content. It generates customizable humanoids and supports adapting… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
FaceGen — where it wins
- Generates heads from photos, random parameters, or 3D scan data
- More than 150 facial controls plus expressions and FACS blendshapes
- Exports meshes and textures for Unity and major 3D tools
Where it doesn't
- Desktop Modeller runs on Windows
- Focuses on human heads rather than full-body avatars
- Paid licenses start at a $300 one-time price
UMA 3 — where it wins
- Runtime customization with bones, DNA, and blendshapes
- Modular clothing, accessories, overlays, and texture atlases
- Mesh combining and optimization for crowd avatars
Where it doesn't
- Platform coverage centers on Unity
- Requires Unity project integration
- Export workflows focus on rigging and source assets
- FaceGen7.0/10 · From $300
A specialized Windows tool for photographic 3D head generation and production exports.
Visit FaceGenFull verdict → - UMA 37.0/10 · Free plan
A free, open-source Unity framework for customizable runtime humanoid avatars.
Visit UMA 3Full verdict →
More comparisons
- MakeHuman vs FaceGen
- MakeHuman vs UMA 3
- Daz Studio vs FaceGen
- Daz Studio vs UMA 3
- IMVU vs FaceGen
- IMVU vs UMA 3
- Reallusion Character Creator vs FaceGen
- Reallusion Character Creator vs UMA 3
All 3D avatar software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026
Last updated · How we research and update

