Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Linters

ESLint vs Astral

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score ESLint #1 in Linters 9.4/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 4 of 4 features Visit ESLint
Astral #10 in Linters 8.2/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 4 features Visit Astral

ESLint leads on 1 check, Astral on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreESLint · 9.4/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresESLint · 4 of 4

ESLint scores higher on our rubric for linters: 9.4 against 8.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #10.

ESLint offers custom rules; Astral doesn't.

ESLint is the better fit for javaScript projects needing an extensible standard. Astral is the better fit for python teams seeking linting, fixes, and formatting.

  • ESLint fits best

    JavaScript projects needing an extensible standard

  • Astral fits best

    Python teams seeking linting, fixes, and formatting

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature ESLint 9.4/10 Visit ↗ Astral 8.2/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.4 8.2
Ranking #1 in Linters #10 in Linters
Best for JavaScript projects needing an extensible standard Python teams seeking linting, fixes, and formatting
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted Self-hosted
Support Community, Docs Docs
Integrations 12 integrations 6 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features ESLint 4/4 · Astral 3/4
Autofix ✓ ✓
Custom rules ✓ (best) —
Security rules ✓ ✓
CI support ✓ ✓
Specs
Languages supported 1 1
IDE support Ide Ide
Our review
Pros
  • Free, open-source static analysis with automatic fixing
  • Custom rules, plugins, parsers, and configurations
  • Integrates with editors, build tools, CI, and Node.js
  • More than 900 built-in lint rules with configurable selection and suppression
  • Can automatically fix supported findings and format Python code
  • Supports editor language servers, Jupyter files, and CI workflows
Cons
  • Primary language scope is JavaScript and JSX
  • Additional languages depend on plugins
  • Autofix applies only to supported issues
  • Supports Python rather than multiple programming languages
  • Does not support custom user-created lint rules
  • Support channels listed are documentation only
Our verdict

ESLint is an open-source static-analysis tool for identifying and fixing problems in JavaScript code. It analyzes code without executing it, reports rule violations, and can automatically fix many supported issues through the --fix…

Read the review →

Astral is a Python developer-tools company whose products include Ruff, an open-source linter and code formatter written in Rust. Ruff is for Python developers and teams that want to check files from the command line, configure which…

Read the review →
  1. ESLintLinters 9.4Free plan
  2. AstralLinters 8.2Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • ESLint — where it wins

    • Free, open-source static analysis with automatic fixing
    • Custom rules, plugins, parsers, and configurations
    • Integrates with editors, build tools, CI, and Node.js

    Where it doesn't

    • Primary language scope is JavaScript and JSX
    • Additional languages depend on plugins
    • Autofix applies only to supported issues
  • Astral — where it wins

    • More than 900 built-in lint rules with configurable selection and suppression
    • Can automatically fix supported findings and format Python code
    • Supports editor language servers, Jupyter files, and CI workflows

    Where it doesn't

    • Supports Python rather than multiple programming languages
    • Does not support custom user-created lint rules
    • Support channels listed are documentation only
  • ESLint9.4/10 · Free plan

    A free, extensible JavaScript linter with autofix, plugins, and broad developer-tool integrations.

    Visit ESLintFull verdict →
  • Astral8.2/10 · Free plan

    An open-source Python linter and formatter with fixes, editor support, and CI integration.

    Visit AstralFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update