Head-to-head · Linters
ESLint vs Astral
ESLint leads on 1 check, Astral on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreESLint · 9.4/10
- Free planboth
- Most featuresESLint · 4 of 4
ESLint scores higher on our rubric for linters: 9.4 against 8.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #10.
ESLint offers custom rules; Astral doesn't.
ESLint is the better fit for javaScript projects needing an extensible standard. Astral is the better fit for python teams seeking linting, fixes, and formatting.
- ESLint fits best
JavaScript projects needing an extensible standard
- Astral fits best
Python teams seeking linting, fixes, and formatting
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | ESLint 9.4/10 Visit ↗ | Astral 8.2/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Ranking | #1 in Linters | #10 in Linters |
| Best for | JavaScript projects needing an extensible standard | Python teams seeking linting, fixes, and formatting |
| Pricing model | Free | Free |
| Starting price | Free plan | Free plan |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Self-hosted | Self-hosted |
| Support | Community, Docs | Docs |
| Integrations | 12 integrations | 6 integrations |
| Built for | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features ESLint 4/4 · Astral 3/4 | ||
| Autofix | ✓ | ✓ |
| Custom rules | ✓ (best) | — |
| Security rules | ✓ | ✓ |
| CI support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Languages supported | 1 | 1 |
| IDE support | Ide | Ide |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | ESLint is an open-source static-analysis tool for identifying and fixing problems in JavaScript code. It analyzes code without executing it, reports rule violations, and can automatically fix many supported issues through the --fix… Read the review → |
Astral is a Python developer-tools company whose products include Ruff, an open-source linter and code formatter written in Rust. Ruff is for Python developers and teams that want to check files from the command line, configure which… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
ESLint — where it wins
- Free, open-source static analysis with automatic fixing
- Custom rules, plugins, parsers, and configurations
- Integrates with editors, build tools, CI, and Node.js
Where it doesn't
- Primary language scope is JavaScript and JSX
- Additional languages depend on plugins
- Autofix applies only to supported issues
Astral — where it wins
- More than 900 built-in lint rules with configurable selection and suppression
- Can automatically fix supported findings and format Python code
- Supports editor language servers, Jupyter files, and CI workflows
Where it doesn't
- Supports Python rather than multiple programming languages
- Does not support custom user-created lint rules
- Support channels listed are documentation only
- ESLint9.4/10 · Free plan
A free, extensible JavaScript linter with autofix, plugins, and broad developer-tool integrations.
Visit ESLintFull verdict → - Astral8.2/10 · Free plan
An open-source Python linter and formatter with fixes, editor support, and CI integration.
Visit AstralFull verdict →
More comparisons
- ESLint vs Ruff
- ESLint vs ShellCheck
- ESLint vs Stylelint
- ESLint vs clang-tidy
- ESLint vs Clippy
- ESLint vs Credo
- ESLint vs Biome
All linters comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update







