Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · AI Literature Review Software

EPPI-Reviewer vs Iris.ai

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score EPPI-Reviewer #1 in AI Literature Review Software 9.2/10 Paid ✓ 3 of 4 features Visit EPPI-Reviewer
Iris.ai #8 in AI Literature Review Software 8.0/10 Free plan · 10-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Iris.ai

EPPI-Reviewer leads on 0 checks, Iris.ai on 1, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreEPPI-Reviewer · 9.2/10
  • Free planonly Iris.ai
  • Free trialonly Iris.ai
  • Most featuresEPPI-Reviewer · 3 of 4

EPPI-Reviewer scores higher on our rubric for ai literature review software: 9.2 against 8.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #8.

Iris.ai offers free plan; EPPI-Reviewer doesn't.

EPPI-Reviewer is the better fit for flexible academic evidence synthesis. Iris.ai is the better fit for organizations analyzing document collections.

  • EPPI-Reviewer fits best

    Flexible academic evidence synthesis

  • Iris.ai fits best

    Organizations analyzing document collections

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature EPPI-Reviewer 9.2/10 Visit ↗ Iris.ai 8.0/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.2 8.0
Ranking #1 in AI Literature Review Software #8 in AI Literature Review Software
Best for Flexible academic evidence synthesis Organizations analyzing document collections
Pricing model Paid Free plan + paid
Starting price — Free plan · 10-day trial
Free plan — ✓ (best)
Free trial — 10 days
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Support Email, Docs Email, Docs
Integrations 2 integrations 4 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features EPPI-Reviewer 3/4 · Iris.ai 0/4
Screening workflow ✓ (best) Not checked yet
AI paper summaries — Not checked yet
Full-text analysis ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Systematic review support ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Specs
Collaboration seats 1 Not checked yet
Export formats RIS, Harvard, Chicago, Excel, HTML, JSON Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Combines screening, coding, qualitative analysis, quantitative analysis and meta-analysis
  • Supports deduplication, clustering, priority screening and study-type classification
  • Offers Zotero integration, OpenAlex discovery and browser-based access
  • Explore literature from text, URLs, or DOI links
  • Chat answers are grounded in dataset documents and linked sources
  • Extract structured data from PDFs, spreadsheets, images, graphs, and tables
Cons
  • Collaboration adds a £35-per-review monthly fee
  • LLM-assisted features require separately purchased credit
  • LLM-assisted work is described as evaluation-only
  • Not centered on a dedicated systematic-review screening workflow
  • The 10-day free trial requires a payment card
  • Self-hosted deployment may not suit teams seeking a web-only service
Our verdict

EPPI-Reviewer is web-based software for managing and analysing literature reviews, including systematic reviews, meta-analyses, framework synthesis and thematic synthesis. It is designed for individual researchers and collaborative review…

Read the review →

For research-intensive organizations and regulated enterprises, Iris.ai combines a research workspace with tools for analyzing organizational document collections. Its RSpace workspace supports literature exploration from text, URLs, or…

Read the review →
  1. EPPI-ReviewerAI Literature Review Software 9.2Paid
  2. Iris.aiAI Literature Review Software 8.0Free plan · 10-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • EPPI-Reviewer — where it wins

    • Combines screening, coding, qualitative analysis, quantitative analysis and meta-analysis
    • Supports deduplication, clustering, priority screening and study-type classification
    • Offers Zotero integration, OpenAlex discovery and browser-based access

    Where it doesn't

    • Collaboration adds a £35-per-review monthly fee
    • LLM-assisted features require separately purchased credit
    • LLM-assisted work is described as evaluation-only
  • Iris.ai — where it wins

    • Explore literature from text, URLs, or DOI links
    • Chat answers are grounded in dataset documents and linked sources
    • Extract structured data from PDFs, spreadsheets, images, graphs, and tables

    Where it doesn't

    • Not centered on a dedicated systematic-review screening workflow
    • The 10-day free trial requires a payment card
    • Self-hosted deployment may not suit teams seeking a web-only service
  • EPPI-Reviewer9.2/10 · Paid

    A broad evidence-synthesis workspace with strong analysis tools and paid collaboration costs.

    Visit EPPI-ReviewerFull verdict →
  • Iris.ai8.0/10 · Free plan · 10-day trial

    Explore research collections, ask source-grounded questions, and extract structured information.

    Visit Iris.aiFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update