Head-to-head · Dental Charting Software
Eaglesoft vs tab32
Eaglesoft leads on 0 checks, tab32 on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoretab32 · 5.0/10
tab32 scores higher on our rubric for dental charting software: 5.0 against 3.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #6 and #3.
Eaglesoft is the better fit for practices valuing established integration breadth. tab32 is the better fit for cloud practices wanting charting and AI workflows.
- Eaglesoft fits best
Practices valuing established integration breadth
- tab32 fits best
Cloud practices wanting charting and AI workflows
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Eaglesoft 3.0/10 Visit ↗ | tab32 5.0/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| Ranking | #3 in Dental Charting Software | #6 in Dental Charting Software |
| Best for | Practices valuing established integration breadth | Cloud practices wanting charting and AI workflows |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Starting price | Not published | Not published |
| Free plan | Not published | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Self-hosted, Desktop, Mobile | Cloud, Browser extension |
| Platforms | Windows | Web |
| Support | Email, Live chat, Phone, Docs | Live chat |
| Compliance | 2FA | SOC 2, HIPAA |
| Integrations | 55+ integrations | 13 integrations |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features Eaglesoft 0/4 · tab32 0/4 | ||
| Tooth charting | Not published | Not published |
| Surface charting | Not published | Not published |
| Periodontal charting | Not published | Not published |
| Chart history | Not published | Not published |
| Specs | ||
| Dentition charts | Not published | Not published |
| Supported platforms | Not published | Not published |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Eaglesoft is a server-based dental practice management system from Patterson Dental for private dental practices. It brings scheduling, patient records, billing, insurance workflows, clinical charting, imaging integration, reporting and… Read the review → |
tab32 brings clinical charting and treatment planning together with scheduling, digital imaging, billing, claims, and patient communications in a cloud platform. Its Alpine offering targets solo dentists and smaller practices, while Summit… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Eaglesoft — where it wins
- Combines scheduling, billing, insurance, charting and treatment planning
- Supports digital imaging and 55 integrations
- Mobile access covers patient information, schedules and tasks
Where it doesn't
- Windows-only platform limits deployment flexibility
- Pricing requires contacting a software sales representative
- Service Club plans require 24-month enrollment
tab32 — where it wins
- Combines charting, treatment plans, imaging, billing, and claims
- AI-assisted eligibility, voice documentation, claims, and radiology workflows
- Multi-location plans add centralized data, reporting, and scheduling
Where it doesn't
- No free plan; the 14-day trial requires a credit card
- Year 2+ Alpine pricing rises from $125 to $225 per month
- Patient self-booking status is unclear
- Eaglesoft3.0/10 · Pricing on request
Broad clinical and practice workflows, with Windows-only deployment and sales-led pricing.
Visit EaglesoftFull verdict → - tab325.0/10 · From $125/mo · 14-day trial
A broad cloud charting suite with AI workflows and plans starting at $125 per month.
Visit tab32Full verdict →
More comparisons
- CareStack vs Eaglesoft
- CareStack vs tab32
- Curve Dental vs Eaglesoft
- Curve Dental vs tab32
- Eaglesoft vs Dentally
- Eaglesoft vs MacPractice
- Eaglesoft vs DentiMax
- Eaglesoft vs Open Dental
All dental charting software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026