Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · MS-DOS Emulators

DOSBox vs DOS Wasm X

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score DOSBox #4 in MS-DOS Emulators 7.4/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 4 features Visit DOSBox
DOS Wasm X #9 in MS-DOS Emulators 6.6/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 2 of 4 features Visit DOS Wasm X

DOSBox leads on 1 check, DOS Wasm X on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreDOSBox · 7.4/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresDOSBox · 3 of 4

DOSBox scores higher on our rubric for ms-dos emulators: 7.4 against 6.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #9.

DOSBox offers audio cd support; DOS Wasm X doesn't publish it.

DOSBox is the better fit for general-purpose classic DOS emulation. DOS Wasm X is the better fit for browser-based DOS and Windows 9x use.

  • DOSBox fits best

    General-purpose classic DOS emulation

  • DOS Wasm X fits best

    Browser-based DOS and Windows 9x use

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature DOSBox 7.4/10 Visit ↗ DOS Wasm X 6.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 7.4 6.6
Ranking #4 in MS-DOS Emulators #9 in MS-DOS Emulators
Best for General-purpose classic DOS emulation Browser-based DOS and Windows 9x use
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Not published Not published
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Desktop Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Windows, macOS, Linux Web
Support Docs Docs
Features DOSBox 3/4 · DOS Wasm X 2/4
Gamepad support ✓ ✓
Save states Not published Not published
Audio CD support ✓ (best) Not published
Source available ✓ ✓
Specs
Supported host platforms Windows, Linux, macOS web, mobile
DOS target versions Dos-compatible Dos-compatible
Disk image formats ISO, CUE/BIN, CUE/IMG, floppy images, hard-drive images ISO, ZIP, BIN, CUE, IMG, 7z
Our review
Pros
  • Free and open source across Windows, macOS, and Linux
  • Emulates period graphics, sound, CPU, controller, and CD hardware
  • Supports directories, floppy images, hard-drive images, and CD images
  • Supports DOS applications, games, Windows 95, and Windows 98
  • Handles ISO, ZIP, BIN, CUE, IMG, 7z, floppy, and CD images
  • Includes file transfer, virtual drives, gamepads, and mobile web support
Cons
  • Primarily operated through command-line commands and configuration files
  • The listed 0.74-3 release dates to an older development period
  • Modern convenience features are less prominent than core emulation support
  • Web-only access limits platform breadth
  • Windows installations require user-provided ISO files
  • Browser-saved virtual drives depend on the browser environment
Our verdict

DOSBox is a free, open-source emulator for running classic DOS games and applications on modern computers. It is aimed at users who need general-purpose DOS compatibility across Windows, macOS, and Linux, with support for DOS-compatible…

Read the review →

DOS Wasm X is an open-source, browser-based emulator for DOS applications and games, built around WebAssembly and based on DOSBox-X. It also supports installing Windows 95 or Windows 98 from user-provided ISO files. The product is aimed at…

Read the review →
  1. DOSBoxMS-DOS Emulators 7.4Free plan
  2. DOS Wasm XMS-DOS Emulators 6.6Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • DOSBox — where it wins

    • Free and open source across Windows, macOS, and Linux
    • Emulates period graphics, sound, CPU, controller, and CD hardware
    • Supports directories, floppy images, hard-drive images, and CD images

    Where it doesn't

    • Primarily operated through command-line commands and configuration files
    • The listed 0.74-3 release dates to an older development period
    • Modern convenience features are less prominent than core emulation support

  • DOS Wasm X — where it wins

    • Supports DOS applications, games, Windows 95, and Windows 98
    • Handles ISO, ZIP, BIN, CUE, IMG, 7z, floppy, and CD images
    • Includes file transfer, virtual drives, gamepads, and mobile web support

    Where it doesn't

    • Web-only access limits platform breadth
    • Windows installations require user-provided ISO files
    • Browser-saved virtual drives depend on the browser environment

More comparisons

All MS-DOS emulators comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026

Last updated · How we research and update