Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Kubernetes Monitoring

Datadog Kubernetes Monitoring vs New Relic Kubernetes Monitoring

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score Datadog Kubernetes Monitoring #1 in Kubernetes Monitoring 9.3/10 Free plan · 14-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Datadog
New Relic Kubernetes Monitoring #4 in Kubernetes Monitoring 8.8/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 4 features Visit New Relic

Datadog Kubernetes Monitoring leads on 1 check, New Relic Kubernetes Monitoring on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreDatadog Kubernetes Monitoring · 9.3/10
  • Lowest starting priceDatadog Kubernetes Monitoring · $1/device/mo
  • Free planboth
  • Free trialonly Datadog Kubernetes Monitoring
  • Most featuresDatadog Kubernetes Monitoring · 4 of 4

Datadog Kubernetes Monitoring scores higher on our rubric for kubernetes monitoring: 9.3 against 8.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #4.

Datadog Kubernetes Monitoring is cheaper to start at $1/mo against $10/mo.

Datadog Kubernetes Monitoring is the better fit for large teams needing mature Kubernetes coverage. New Relic Kubernetes Monitoring is the better fit for teams wanting Kubernetes telemetry with a free entry tier.

  • Datadog Kubernetes Monitoring fits best

    Large teams needing mature Kubernetes coverage

  • New Relic Kubernetes Monitoring fits best

    Teams wanting Kubernetes telemetry with a free entry tier

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Datadog Kubernetes Monitoring 9.3/10 Visit ↗ New Relic Kubernetes Monitoring 8.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.3 8.8
Ranking #1 in Kubernetes Monitoring #4 in Kubernetes Monitoring
Best for Large teams needing mature Kubernetes coverage Teams wanting Kubernetes telemetry with a free entry tier
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price $1/device/mo (best) $10/user/mo
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial 14 days —
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Support Docs Tickets, Community, Docs
Compliance SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS, SSO/SAML GDPR, HIPAA, SSO/SAML
Integrations 1,000+ integrations 780+ integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Datadog Kubernetes Monitoring 4/4 · New Relic Kubernetes Monitoring 0/4
Control-plane monitoring ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Kubernetes logs ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Distributed tracing ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Managed Kubernetes support ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Specs
Alerting channels email, Slack, PagerDuty, Microsoft Teams, webhooks Not checked yet
Data retention 450 days Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Covers clusters, workloads, control-plane components, logs, and traces
  • Supports EKS, AKS, GKE, and self-managed Kubernetes
  • Includes dashboards, alerting, anomaly detection, and correlated telemetry
  • Correlates Kubernetes metrics, events, logs, and traces
  • Free plan includes 100 GB of monthly data ingest
  • Ingests Prometheus and OpenTelemetry telemetry
Cons
  • Pricing spans infrastructure, container, and related products
  • Free plan is limited to 5 hosts and 1 day of retention
  • The broad feature set may exceed focused Kubernetes monitoring needs
  • Standard limits full platform access to five users
  • Standard and Pro charge per user, with data ingest overages
  • Kubernetes Monitoring is part of a broader observability platform
Our verdict

Datadog Kubernetes Monitoring brings cluster, pod, node, workload, and control-plane visibility into Datadog’s broader observability platform. It is designed for large teams operating cloud-native applications across self-managed…

Read the review →

New Relic Kubernetes Monitoring brings cluster, workload, container, and application telemetry into New Relic’s observability platform. It is aimed at engineering, DevOps, and platform teams operating Kubernetes environments, including…

Read the review →
  1. Datadog Kubernetes MonitoringKubernetes Monitoring 9.3Free plan · 14-day trial
  2. New Relic Kubernetes MonitoringKubernetes Monitoring 8.8Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Datadog Kubernetes Monitoring — where it wins

    • Covers clusters, workloads, control-plane components, logs, and traces
    • Supports EKS, AKS, GKE, and self-managed Kubernetes
    • Includes dashboards, alerting, anomaly detection, and correlated telemetry

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing spans infrastructure, container, and related products
    • Free plan is limited to 5 hosts and 1 day of retention
    • The broad feature set may exceed focused Kubernetes monitoring needs
  • New Relic Kubernetes Monitoring — where it wins

    • Correlates Kubernetes metrics, events, logs, and traces
    • Free plan includes 100 GB of monthly data ingest
    • Ingests Prometheus and OpenTelemetry telemetry

    Where it doesn't

    • Standard limits full platform access to five users
    • Standard and Pro charge per user, with data ingest overages
    • Kubernetes Monitoring is part of a broader observability platform
  • Datadog Kubernetes Monitoring9.3/10 · Free plan · 14-day trial

    A broad Kubernetes observability platform for teams managing complex cloud-native environments.

    Visit DatadogFull verdict →
  • New Relic Kubernetes Monitoring8.8/10 · Free plan

    Kubernetes telemetry spans metrics, events, logs, and traces, with a free entry tier.

    Visit New RelicFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update