Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Ai Development Tools

Cursor vs Dify

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Higher score Cursor #1 in Ai Development Tools 9.2/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 3 features Visit Cursor
Dify #7 in Ai Development Tools 8.3/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 3 features Visit Dify

Cursor leads on 0 checks, Dify on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreCursor · 9.2/10
  • Free planboth

Cursor scores higher on our rubric for ai development tools: 9.2 against 8.3 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #7.

Cursor is the better fit for developers seeking an AI coding assistant. Dify is the better fit for teams building visual LLM apps and RAG workflows.

  • Cursor fits best

    Developers seeking an AI coding assistant

  • Dify fits best

    Teams building visual LLM apps and RAG workflows

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Cursor 9.2/10 Visit ↗ Dify 8.3/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.2 8.3
Ranking #1 in Ai Development Tools #7 in Ai Development Tools
Best for Developers seeking an AI coding assistant Teams building visual LLM apps and RAG workflows
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price $20/user/mo —
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Desktop Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Windows, macOS, Linux Web
Support Docs, Community Email, Community, Docs
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Cursor 0/3 · Dify 0/3
API access Not checked yet Not checked yet
Agent workflows Not checked yet Not checked yet
Code generation Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Model access Not checked yet Not checked yet
Deployment targets Not checked yet Not checked yet
Monthly AI credits Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Inline completion, conversational code chat, and natural-language editing
  • Repository indexing gives AI features codebase context
  • Agent can edit multiple files and use terminal and tools
  • Visual workflows combine agents, retrieval, tools, code, and human review.
  • Publish apps as web apps, APIs, or MCP-compatible workflow tools.
  • Cloud and self-hosted options, with an ecosystem of 260 integrations.
Cons
  • Desktop-only deployment; no self-hosted option
  • Advanced AI usage and features require paid plans
  • Support channels are docs and community
  • Sandbox is limited to 200 message credits and one team member.
  • Professional starts at $59 per workspace monthly; larger teams need Team.
  • Voice agents depend on a Marketplace extension, not a core channel.
Our verdict

Cursor is a desktop code editor built around AI-assisted software development, aimed at individual developers and software teams. It combines inline code completion and conversational code chat with repository indexing, natural-language…

Read the review →

Dify is an open-source platform for building, deploying, and managing AI applications, agent workflows, and RAG-powered systems. Its visual workflow canvas is aimed at developers and teams that want to connect model calls, knowledge…

Read the review →
  1. CursorAi Development Tools 9.2Free plan
  2. DifyAi Development Tools 8.3Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Cursor — where it wins

    • Inline completion, conversational code chat, and natural-language editing
    • Repository indexing gives AI features codebase context
    • Agent can edit multiple files and use terminal and tools

    Where it doesn't

    • Desktop-only deployment; no self-hosted option
    • Advanced AI usage and features require paid plans
    • Support channels are docs and community
  • Dify — where it wins

    • Visual workflows combine agents, retrieval, tools, code, and human review.
    • Publish apps as web apps, APIs, or MCP-compatible workflow tools.
    • Cloud and self-hosted options, with an ecosystem of 260 integrations.

    Where it doesn't

    • Sandbox is limited to 200 message credits and one team member.
    • Professional starts at $59 per workspace monthly; larger teams need Team.
    • Voice agents depend on a Marketplace extension, not a core channel.

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update