Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Electronic Medical Records - Outpatient Software

Criterions EHR vs RXNT EHR

  • Updated Nov 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side

Criterions EHR leads on 0 checks, RXNT EHR on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreCriterions EHR · 8.5/10
  • Most featuresCriterions EHR · 4 of 5

Criterions EHR scores higher on our rubric for electronic medical records - outpatient software: 8.5 against 8.3 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #4.

Criterions EHR is the better fit for small practices needing configurable, interoperable EHR. RXNT EHR is the better fit for practices seeking an outpatient EHR with optional billing.

  • Criterions EHR fits best

    Small practices needing configurable, interoperable EHR

  • RXNT EHR fits best

    Practices seeking an outpatient EHR with optional billing

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Criterions EHR 8.5/10 Visit ↗ RXNT EHR 8.3/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.5 8.3
Ranking #3 in Electronic Medical Records - Outpatient Software #4 in Electronic Medical Records - Outpatient Software
Best for Small practices needing configurable, interoperable EHR Practices seeking an outpatient EHR with optional billing
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request $1,275/yr
Free plan — —
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Mobile
Platforms Web Web, iOS, Android
Support Phone, Email, Docs · 24/7 Email, Phone, Docs
Compliance GDPR, 2FA HIPAA, SOC 2
Integrations 2 integrations 6 integrations
Built for Small business Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Criterions EHR 4/5 · RXNT EHR 0/5
E-prescribing ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Patient portal ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Specialty templates ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Integrated telehealth Not checked yet Not checked yet
Mobile access ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Our review
Pros
  • Configurable problem lists, visit templates, and specialty-specific chart layouts
  • E-prescribing includes allergy and interaction checks plus renewal workflows
  • FHIR exchange, API endpoints, and bi-directional lab and HL7 interfaces
  • Configurable templates and workflows support specialty charting.
  • Lab orders, results, referrals, and e-faxes connect with patient charts.
  • iOS and Android apps support EHR documentation and scheduling.
Cons
  • Modular pricing requires a demo and sales quote
  • Some online patient-service functions may add ongoing monthly costs
  • Web deployment may not suit practices seeking a different platform
  • Billing and scheduling require the higher-priced Full Suite.
  • Annual EHR pricing is listed, but provider-based billing is unspecified.
  • Cardiology-specific ECG, DICOM/PACS, and device-data workflows are unclear.
Our verdict

Criterions EHR is a cloud-based electronic health record for independent and small-group medical practices. Its configurable charts, problem lists, visit templates, and layouts support practices that need to adapt documentation to…

Read the review →

RXNT EHR is a cloud-based electronic health record system for ambulatory medical practices and healthcare organizations. It is aimed at practices that want configurable charting, e-prescribing, and patient communication, with mobile access…

Read the review →
  1. Criterions EHRElectronic Medical Records - Outpatient Software 8.5Pricing on request
  2. RXNT EHRElectronic Medical Records - Outpatient Software 8.3Paid

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Criterions EHR — where it wins

    • Configurable problem lists, visit templates, and specialty-specific chart layouts
    • E-prescribing includes allergy and interaction checks plus renewal workflows
    • FHIR exchange, API endpoints, and bi-directional lab and HL7 interfaces

    Where it doesn't

    • Modular pricing requires a demo and sales quote
    • Some online patient-service functions may add ongoing monthly costs
    • Web deployment may not suit practices seeking a different platform
  • RXNT EHR — where it wins

    • Configurable templates and workflows support specialty charting.
    • Lab orders, results, referrals, and e-faxes connect with patient charts.
    • iOS and Android apps support EHR documentation and scheduling.

    Where it doesn't

    • Billing and scheduling require the higher-priced Full Suite.
    • Annual EHR pricing is listed, but provider-based billing is unspecified.
    • Cardiology-specific ECG, DICOM/PACS, and device-data workflows are unclear.

Criterions EHR vs RXNT EHR: questions

Which is better for electronic medical records - outpatient software, Criterions EHR or RXNT EHR?

Criterions EHR scores higher on our rubric for electronic medical records - outpatient software: 8.5 against 8.3 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #4.

How do Criterions EHR and RXNT EHR compare?

All 5 checks we put side by side come out level: neither leads on any.

Do Criterions EHR and RXNT EHR have a free plan?

Criterions EHR: No. RXNT EHR: No.

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Nov 2026

Last updated · How we research and update