Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Data Subject Access Request (DSAR) Software

ConsentCenter vs DPO Works Subject Access Request

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score ConsentCenter #4 in Data Subject Access Request (DSAR) Software 8.5/10 Pricing on request ✓ 0 of 4 features Visit ConsentCenter

ConsentCenter leads on 0 checks, DPO Works Subject Access Request on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreConsentCenter · 8.5/10
  • Free trialonly DPO Works Subject Access Request
  • Most featuresDPO Works Subject Access Request · 3 of 4

ConsentCenter scores higher on our rubric for data subject access request (dsar) software: 8.5 against 8.1 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #6.

ConsentCenter is the better fit for teams combining DSARs with consent governance. DPO Works Subject Access Request is the better fit for organizations needing API-led data collection.

  • ConsentCenter fits best

    Teams combining DSARs with consent governance

  • DPO Works Subject Access Request fits best

    Organizations needing API-led data collection

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature ConsentCenter 8.5/10 Visit ↗ DPO Works Subject Access Request 8.1/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.5 8.1
Ranking #4 in Data Subject Access Request (DSAR) Software #6 in Data Subject Access Request (DSAR) Software
Best for Teams combining DSARs with consent governance Organizations needing API-led data collection
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request £995/yr
Free plan Not checked yet —
Free trial — 14 days
Deployment Self-hosted Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Support Email Email, Phone
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features ConsentCenter 0/4 · DPO Works Subject Access Request 3/4
Identity verification Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Automated data discovery Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Fulfillment workflow Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Audit log Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Request intake channels Not checked yet Portal
Rights covered Not checked yet Multiple_rights
Monthly request limit Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Manages DSAR intake, identity checks, assignment, SLAs, fulfilment, and evidence
  • Pairs consent policies and preferences with an immutable ledger and audit trail
  • Offers REST and GraphQL APIs, SDKs, webhooks, and 200 integrations
  • Configurable web intake includes GDPR and CCPA request templates.
  • State-based workflow and countdown timers track requests through closure.
  • API-triggered collection retrieves data from numerous sources.
Cons
  • Contact-sales pricing makes costs harder to assess
  • Data Mapping is still being finalised
  • Self-hosted deployment may not suit teams seeking a hosted service
  • The £995 annual entry plan offers only limited API-based retrieval.
  • Express costs £11,995 per year, substantially more than the entry plan.
  • The published plans do not list integrations.
Our verdict

ConsentCenter brings consent governance and data subject access request handling into a privacy platform for teams that need both. Its DSAR workflow covers intake, identity verification, assignment, SLA tracking, fulfilment, and evidence,…

Read the review →

DPO Works Subject Access Request is a cloud SaaS module for collecting and processing data-subject requests. It suits organizations that need a configurable web intake, structured handling from submission to closure, and API-led data…

Read the review →
  1. ConsentCenterData Subject Access Request (DSAR) Software 8.5Pricing on request
  2. DPO Works Subject Access RequestData Subject Access Request (DSAR) Software 8.114-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • ConsentCenter — where it wins

    • Manages DSAR intake, identity checks, assignment, SLAs, fulfilment, and evidence
    • Pairs consent policies and preferences with an immutable ledger and audit trail
    • Offers REST and GraphQL APIs, SDKs, webhooks, and 200 integrations

    Where it doesn't

    • Contact-sales pricing makes costs harder to assess
    • Data Mapping is still being finalised
    • Self-hosted deployment may not suit teams seeking a hosted service
  • DPO Works Subject Access Request — where it wins

    • Configurable web intake includes GDPR and CCPA request templates.
    • State-based workflow and countdown timers track requests through closure.
    • API-triggered collection retrieves data from numerous sources.

    Where it doesn't

    • The £995 annual entry plan offers only limited API-based retrieval.
    • Express costs £11,995 per year, substantially more than the entry plan.
    • The published plans do not list integrations.
  • ConsentCenter8.5/10 · Pricing on request

    Combines consent governance and end-to-end DSAR workflows with data mapping and audit records.

    Visit ConsentCenterFull verdict →
  • DPO Works Subject Access Request8.1/10 · 14-day trial

    A DSAR workflow with identity checks and API-based collection, starting at £995 per year.

    Visit DPO WorksFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update