Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · A/B Testing Tools

Conductrics vs ABsmartly

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score Conductrics #22 in A/B Testing Tools 7.1/10 Pricing on request ✓ 4 of 5 features Visit Conductrics
ABsmartly #41 in A/B Testing Tools 5.3/10 Pricing on request ✓ 5 of 5 features Visit ABsmartly

Conductrics leads on 0 checks, ABsmartly on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreConductrics · 7.1/10
  • Most featuresABsmartly · 5 of 5

Conductrics scores higher on our rubric for a/b testing tools: 7.1 against 5.3 out of 10; our editors rank them #22 and #41.

Conductrics is the better fit for technical teams needing flexible deployment. ABsmartly is the better fit for enterprise teams needing rigorous experimentation.

  • Conductrics fits best

    Technical teams needing flexible deployment

  • ABsmartly fits best

    Enterprise teams needing rigorous experimentation

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Conductrics 7.1/10 Visit ↗ ABsmartly 5.3/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 7.1 5.3
Ranking #22 in A/B Testing Tools #41 in A/B Testing Tools
Best for Technical teams needing flexible deployment Enterprise teams needing rigorous experimentation
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request —
Free plan Not checked yet —
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted, Mobile, Browser extension Cloud, Self-hosted, Browser extension
Platforms Web, iOS, Android, Chrome extension Web, iOS, Android, Chrome extension
Support Email, Community, Docs Email, Live chat, Docs
Compliance SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA, SSO/SAML, 2FA SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, SSO/SAML
Integrations 9 integrations 4 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Conductrics 4/5 · ABsmartly 5/5
Visual editor ✓ ✓
Server-side testing ✓ ✓
Mobile SDK ✓ ✓
Audience targeting ✓ ✓
Feature flags Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Specs
Test types A/B testing, multivariate testing, adaptive optimization, personalization A/B testing; A/B/n multi-variant testing; Fixed Horizon; Group Sequential Testing
Supported platforms Web_and_mobile Web_and_mobile
Our review
Pros
  • Supports A/B, multivariate, server-side, and contextual bandit tests
  • Deploys across web, mobile, REST APIs, or self-hosted JavaScript
  • Adds targeting, guardrails, surveys, and statistical analysis
  • Fixed-horizon and group-sequential statistical analysis
  • Client- and server-side testing with feature flags
  • SaaS or self-hosted deployment across web and mobile
Cons
  • Purchase requires a sales conversation rather than a listed plan
  • Technical deployment options may require API or SDK work
  • Offers more breadth than a simple A/B-only workflow needs
  • Pricing requires a sales conversation
  • No free plan is available
  • Its broad feature set may exceed simpler testing needs
Our verdict

Conductrics is an enterprise experimentation platform for product, marketing, engineering, and data teams. It covers client-side web experiments, multivariate testing, server-side testing through REST APIs, contextual multi-armed bandits,…

Read the review →

ABsmartly is an experimentation and feature-flag platform for product, engineering, and data teams. It is designed for organizations running experimentation programs across web applications, mobile apps, and backend systems. The platform…

Read the review →
  1. ConductricsA/B Testing Tools 7.1Pricing on request
  2. ABsmartlyA/B Testing Tools 5.3Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Conductrics — where it wins

    • Supports A/B, multivariate, server-side, and contextual bandit tests
    • Deploys across web, mobile, REST APIs, or self-hosted JavaScript
    • Adds targeting, guardrails, surveys, and statistical analysis

    Where it doesn't

    • Purchase requires a sales conversation rather than a listed plan
    • Technical deployment options may require API or SDK work
    • Offers more breadth than a simple A/B-only workflow needs

  • ABsmartly — where it wins

    • Fixed-horizon and group-sequential statistical analysis
    • Client- and server-side testing with feature flags
    • SaaS or self-hosted deployment across web and mobile

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires a sales conversation
    • No free plan is available
    • Its broad feature set may exceed simpler testing needs
  • Conductrics7.1/10 · Pricing on request

    A broad experimentation platform for technical teams that need flexible deployment.

    Visit ConductricsFull verdict →
  • ABsmartly5.3/10 · Pricing on request

    A rigorous experimentation suite for teams running tests across web, mobile, and backend systems.

    Visit ABsmartlyFull verdict →

All A/B testing tools comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update