Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Patents Drafting And Analysis Software

ClaimMaster vs DeepIP

  • Updated Nov 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score ClaimMaster #3 in Patents Drafting And Analysis Software 7.9/10 30-day trial Free trial✓ 4 of 4 features Visit ClaimMaster
DeepIP #4 in Patents Drafting And Analysis Software 7.8/10 Pricing on request ✓ 4 of 4 features Visit DeepIP

ClaimMaster leads on 0 checks, DeepIP on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreClaimMaster · 7.9/10
  • Free trialonly ClaimMaster

ClaimMaster scores higher on our rubric for patents drafting and analysis software: 7.9 against 7.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #4.

On document export, ClaimMaster gives you Pdf where DeepIP offers Docx.

ClaimMaster is the better fit for patent practitioners focused on drafting workflows. DeepIP is the better fit for teams seeking AI-assisted drafting and prosecution.

  • ClaimMaster fits best

    Patent practitioners focused on drafting workflows

  • DeepIP fits best

    Teams seeking AI-assisted drafting and prosecution

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature ClaimMaster 7.9/10 Visit ↗ DeepIP 7.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 7.9 7.8
Ranking #3 in Patents Drafting And Analysis Software #4 in Patents Drafting And Analysis Software
Best for Patent practitioners focused on drafting workflows Teams seeking AI-assisted drafting and prosecution
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price $20/user/mo Pricing on request
Free plan — —
Free trial 30 days —
Deployment Desktop Cloud
Platforms Windows Web
Support Email, Phone, Docs Email
Integrations 6 integrations 4 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features ClaimMaster 4/4 · DeepIP 4/4
Patent drafting ✓ ✓
Patent search ✓ ✓
Patent analytics ✓ ✓
Claim analysis ✓ ✓
Specs
Jurisdictions covered Not checked yet Not checked yet
Document export Pdf Docx
Our review
Pros
  • Checks claims and specifications for support, numbering, and consistency issues
  • Generates application sections, figures, Office Action shells, and USPTO forms
  • Connects Word workflows with USPTO, EPO, Google Patents, and GPT tools
  • Generates structured patent applications from invention disclosures
  • Analyzes rejections and drafts office-action responses with case-law citations
  • Connects Word and Outlook with prior-art and FTO workflows
Cons
  • Runs on Windows as a desktop add-in, not as a cloud proofreading service
  • Plan features are split across Lite, Lite+Shells, QA, and Pro
  • The $20 per-user monthly starting rate requires annual billing
  • No free plan; subscription pricing requires contacting sales
  • Starting the free trial requires a credit card
  • Supports professional legal judgment rather than replacing it
Our verdict

ClaimMaster is a Windows add-in for Microsoft Word that brings patent proofreading, drafting, and prosecution automation into a practitioner’s document workflow. Patent attorneys, agents, paralegals, and other patent practitioners can use…

Read the review →

DeepIP brings AI-assisted drafting and analysis into workflows for patent professionals, including law firms and in-house IP teams. It generates structured application drafts from invention disclosures, checks drafts against USPTO and EPO…

Read the review →
  1. ClaimMasterPatents Drafting And Analysis Software 7.930-day trial
  2. DeepIPPatents Drafting And Analysis Software 7.8Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • ClaimMaster — where it wins

    • Checks claims and specifications for support, numbering, and consistency issues
    • Generates application sections, figures, Office Action shells, and USPTO forms
    • Connects Word workflows with USPTO, EPO, Google Patents, and GPT tools

    Where it doesn't

    • Runs on Windows as a desktop add-in, not as a cloud proofreading service
    • Plan features are split across Lite, Lite+Shells, QA, and Pro
    • The $20 per-user monthly starting rate requires annual billing
  • DeepIP — where it wins

    • Generates structured patent applications from invention disclosures
    • Analyzes rejections and drafts office-action responses with case-law citations
    • Connects Word and Outlook with prior-art and FTO workflows

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan; subscription pricing requires contacting sales
    • Starting the free trial requires a credit card
    • Supports professional legal judgment rather than replacing it

ClaimMaster vs DeepIP: questions

Which is better for patents drafting and analysis software, ClaimMaster or DeepIP?

ClaimMaster scores higher on our rubric for patents drafting and analysis software: 7.9 against 7.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #4.

How do ClaimMaster and DeepIP compare?

All 5 checks we put side by side come out level: neither leads on any.

Do ClaimMaster and DeepIP have a free plan?

ClaimMaster: No. DeepIP: No.

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Nov 2026

Last updated · How we research and update