Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Metrics Monitoring Tools

Checkmk vs SolarWinds Hybrid Cloud Observability

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 2 checks side by side
Higher score Checkmk #6 in Metrics Monitoring Tools 8.7/10 Free plan · 30-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 0 of 3 features Visit Checkmk
SolarWinds Hybrid Cloud Observability #7 in Metrics Monitoring Tools 8.6/10 30-day trial Free trial✓ 1 of 3 features Visit SolarWinds

Checkmk leads on 1 check, SolarWinds Hybrid Cloud Observability on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreCheckmk · 8.7/10
  • Free planonly Checkmk
  • Free trialboth
  • Most featuresSolarWinds Hybrid Cloud Observability · 1 of 3

Checkmk scores higher on our rubric for metrics monitoring tools: 8.7 against 8.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #6 and #7.

Checkmk offers free plan; SolarWinds Hybrid Cloud Observability doesn't.

Checkmk is the better fit for enterprise self-hosted infrastructure monitoring. SolarWinds Hybrid Cloud Observability is the better fit for enterprise hybrid infrastructure estates.

  • Checkmk fits best

    Enterprise self-hosted infrastructure monitoring

  • SolarWinds Hybrid Cloud Observability fits best

    Enterprise hybrid infrastructure estates

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Checkmk 8.7/10 Visit ↗ SolarWinds Hybrid Cloud Observability 8.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.7 8.6
Ranking #6 in Metrics Monitoring Tools #7 in Metrics Monitoring Tools
Best for Enterprise self-hosted infrastructure monitoring Enterprise hybrid infrastructure estates
Pricing model Free plan + paid Paid
Starting price €190/mo $8/device/mo
Free plan ✓ (best) —
Free trial 30 days 30 days
Free trial length 30 days 30 days
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Desktop, Self-hosted
Platforms Web, Linux, Windows Web, Windows
Integrations 2,000+ integrations 6 integrations
Features Checkmk 0/3 · SolarWinds Hybrid Cloud Observability 1/3
Custom metrics Not checked yet Not checked yet
Self-hosted option Not checked yet ✓ (best)
SLO tracking Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Data retention Not checked yet Not checked yet
Query language Not checked yet Not checked yet
Data ingestion Not checked yet Multiple
Our review
Pros
  • Monitors servers, networks, storage, cloud, Kubernetes, and virtual machines
  • Automatic discovery plus agent-based and agentless collection methods
  • 2,000+ integrations with dashboards, historical data, and distributed monitoring
  • Monitors networks, servers, applications, databases, clouds, and virtualization
  • Supports agent-based, agentless, and API-sourced infrastructure metrics
  • Adds dependency mapping, distributed polling, and ML-powered anomaly alerts
Cons
  • Paid self-hosted plans start at €190 per month with annual billing
  • Community edition is limited to approximately 100 hosts
  • Professional support is reserved for paid tiers
  • No free plan is available
  • Advanced monitoring capabilities require higher-priced tiers
  • Platform coverage is narrower than some broader observability suites
Our verdict

Checkmk is an infrastructure monitoring and observability platform for IT teams overseeing on-premises, cloud, hybrid, and containerized environments. It covers servers, networks, storage, cloud services, Kubernetes, VMware ESXi and…

Read the review →

SolarWinds Hybrid Cloud Observability is a self-hosted monitoring and observability platform for IT operations and infrastructure teams managing hybrid estates. It brings together monitoring for networks, servers, applications, databases,…

Read the review →
  1. CheckmkMetrics Monitoring Tools 8.7Free plan · 30-day trial
  2. SolarWinds Hybrid Cloud ObservabilityMetrics Monitoring Tools 8.630-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Checkmk — where it wins

    • Monitors servers, networks, storage, cloud, Kubernetes, and virtual machines
    • Automatic discovery plus agent-based and agentless collection methods
    • 2,000+ integrations with dashboards, historical data, and distributed monitoring

    Where it doesn't

    • Paid self-hosted plans start at €190 per month with annual billing
    • Community edition is limited to approximately 100 hosts
    • Professional support is reserved for paid tiers
  • SolarWinds Hybrid Cloud Observability — where it wins

    • Monitors networks, servers, applications, databases, clouds, and virtualization
    • Supports agent-based, agentless, and API-sourced infrastructure metrics
    • Adds dependency mapping, distributed polling, and ML-powered anomaly alerts

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan is available
    • Advanced monitoring capabilities require higher-priced tiers
    • Platform coverage is narrower than some broader observability suites
  • Checkmk8.7/10 · Free plan · 30-day trial

    Broad infrastructure coverage with a free community edition and costly paid self-hosted tiers.

    Visit CheckmkFull verdict →
  • SolarWinds Hybrid Cloud Observability8.6/10 · 30-day trial

    Broad hybrid infrastructure monitoring with node-based pricing and self-hosted deployment.

    Visit SolarWindsFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update