ChartLogic Plastic Surgery EHR vs AestuteOS

ChartLogic Plastic Surgery EHR6.9Visit AestuteOS6.8Visit

Higher score ChartLogic Plastic Surgery EHR #6 in Plastic Surgery Software 6.9/10 Pricing on request ✓ 4 of 7 features Visit ChartLogic

vs

AestuteOS #8 in Plastic Surgery Software 6.8/10 From €99/mo ✓ 5 of 7 features Visit AestuteOS

• ChartLogic Plastic Surgery EHR fits best

  Plastic surgeons needing EHR and revenue-cycle tools

• AestuteOS fits best

  Clinics managing aesthetic consultations and treatment

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature	ChartLogic Plastic Surgery EHR 6.9/10 Visit ↗	AestuteOS 6.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	6.9	6.8
Ranking	#6 in Plastic Surgery Software	#8 in Plastic Surgery Software
Best for	Plastic surgeons needing EHR and revenue-cycle tools	Clinics managing aesthetic consultations and treatment
Pricing model	Paid	Paid
Starting price	Not published	Not published
Free plan	Not published	—
Free trial	—	—
Deployment	Cloud	Cloud
Platforms	Web	Web
Built for	Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise	Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features ChartLogic Plastic Surgery EHR 4/7 · AestuteOS 5/7
Photo management	Not published	✓ (best)
Surgical planning	Not published	✓ (best)
Digital consent forms	Not published	✓ (best)
Online appointment booking	✓	✓
Patient portal	✓ (best)	Not published
Billing and claims	✓	✓
E-prescribing	✓ (best)	Not published
Our review
Pros	Plastic surgery-specific templates and flow sheets Patient portal supports appointment requests, intake and secure messaging Combines practice management and claims tools with revenue-cycle services	Links treatment-specific consent with photos, notes, products and aftercare Tracks stock, payments and margin reporting alongside patient records Review-led AI drafts replies, summaries and documents for staff approval
Cons	Pricing requires contacting sales and discussing a demo Cloud deployment and web access may not suit every workflow Not open source	No full scheduling or patient-portal workflow in the listed feature set Clinical workflows start at €299 per clinic per month Web-only deployment may not suit clinics seeking a native desktop or mobile app
Our verdict	ChartLogic Plastic Surgery EHR brings electronic health records and practice management together for plastic surgery practices. Its specialty-specific templates and flow sheets are paired with a customizable note template builder, voice… Read the review →	AestuteOS is a cloud clinic operations platform for aesthetic medicine and cosmetic surgery practices. It connects enquiries and consultation preparation with consent, treatment records, photos, aftercare, documents, stock, finance,… Read the review →

Strengths and trade-offs

• ChartLogic Plastic Surgery EHR — where it wins

  • Plastic surgery-specific templates and flow sheets
  • Patient portal supports appointment requests, intake and secure messaging
  • Combines practice management and claims tools with revenue-cycle services

  Where it doesn't

  • Pricing requires contacting sales and discussing a demo
  • Cloud deployment and web access may not suit every workflow
  • Not open source

• AestuteOS — where it wins

  • Links treatment-specific consent with photos, notes, products and aftercare
  • Tracks stock, payments and margin reporting alongside patient records
  • Review-led AI drafts replies, summaries and documents for staff approval

  Where it doesn't

  • No full scheduling or patient-portal workflow in the listed feature set
  • Clinical workflows start at €299 per clinic per month
  • Web-only deployment may not suit clinics seeking a native desktop or mobile app

• ChartLogic Plastic Surgery EHR6.9/10 · Pricing on request

  Plastic surgery-focused EHR with scheduling, patient intake, claims tools and revenue-cycle services.

  Visit ChartLogicFull verdict →
• AestuteOS6.8/10 · From €99/mo

  Aesthetic clinics can link enquiries, consent, treatment records, stock and finance.

  Visit AestuteOSFull verdict →