Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Citizen Engagement Software

Cap Collectif vs Civio Engage

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 2 checks side by side
Higher score Cap Collectif #3 in Citizen Engagement Software 8.8/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 1 of 1 features Visit Cap Collectif
Civio Engage #4 in Citizen Engagement Software 8.6/10 Pricing on request ✓ 1 of 1 features Visit Civio Engage

Cap Collectif leads on 0 checks, Civio Engage on 0, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreCap Collectif · 8.8/10
  • Free planonly Cap Collectif

Cap Collectif scores higher on our rubric for citizen engagement software: 8.8 against 8.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #4.

On accessibility standard, Cap Collectif gives you Not_stated where Civio Engage offers Wcag_2_1_aa.

Cap Collectif is the better fit for organizations running varied public participation projects. Civio Engage is the better fit for teams needing analytics-rich, multilingual engagement.

  • Cap Collectif fits best

    Organizations running varied public participation projects

  • Civio Engage fits best

    Teams needing analytics-rich, multilingual engagement

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Cap Collectif 8.8/10 Visit ↗ Civio Engage 8.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.8 8.6
Ranking #3 in Citizen Engagement Software #4 in Citizen Engagement Software
Best for Organizations running varied public participation projects Teams needing analytics-rich, multilingual engagement
Pricing model Free plan + paid Paid
Starting price — —
Free plan ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Support Email, Docs Docs, Tickets
Compliance GDPR ISO 27001, 2FA
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Cap Collectif 1/1 · Civio Engage 1/1
Participatory budgeting ✓ ✓
Specs
Participation methods participatory budgeting; consultations; questionnaires; calls for projects; voting; digital registers; petitions; debates; questions and answers; interactive mapping; idea box; relationship facilitation surveys, idea boards, polls, discussions, Q&A, map-based feedback, participatory budgeting, events
Supported languages Not checked yet 40
Named integrations Not checked yet Not checked yet
Accessibility standard Not_stated Wcag_2_1_aa
Our review
Pros
  • Covers budgeting, consultations, petitions, debates, maps, and public registers
  • Offers a free open-source edition for self-hosting
  • Purpoz paid plans include moderation and technical assistance
  • Combines surveys, discussions, mapping, events and participatory budgeting.
  • Dashboards, reporting exports and AI-assisted analysis help review input.
  • Translation settings cover 40+ languages; WCAG 2.1 AA is listed.
Cons
  • Self-hosting puts hosting, maintenance, backups, updates, and security on the customer
  • Customizable SaaS is quote-based rather than a listed fixed price
  • Purpoz plans are annual and priced in euros excluding tax
  • Plans require a pricing request rather than displaying prices.
  • Community Connect limits teams to 1 administrator and up to 5 projects.
  • API access is listed only for Enterprise Alliance.
Our verdict

Cap Collectif brings online participation methods together for local authorities, governments, universities, companies, associations, and other institutions. Its tools span participatory budgeting, consultations, questionnaires, calls for…

Read the review →

Civio Engage brings community participation tools into a cloud platform for cities, government agencies and enterprises. It supports surveys, idea boards, polls, discussions, Q&A, map-based feedback, participatory budgeting and events,…

Read the review →
  1. Cap CollectifCitizen Engagement Software 8.8Free plan
  2. Civio EngageCitizen Engagement Software 8.6Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Cap Collectif — where it wins

    • Covers budgeting, consultations, petitions, debates, maps, and public registers
    • Offers a free open-source edition for self-hosting
    • Purpoz paid plans include moderation and technical assistance

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosting puts hosting, maintenance, backups, updates, and security on the customer
    • Customizable SaaS is quote-based rather than a listed fixed price
    • Purpoz plans are annual and priced in euros excluding tax
  • Civio Engage — where it wins

    • Combines surveys, discussions, mapping, events and participatory budgeting.
    • Dashboards, reporting exports and AI-assisted analysis help review input.
    • Translation settings cover 40+ languages; WCAG 2.1 AA is listed.

    Where it doesn't

    • Plans require a pricing request rather than displaying prices.
    • Community Connect limits teams to 1 administrator and up to 5 projects.
    • API access is listed only for Enterprise Alliance.

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update