Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Data Center Automation

Canonical MAAS vs HPE OneView

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Higher score Canonical MAAS #1 in Data Center Automation 9.3/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 3 features Visit Canonical MAAS
HPE OneView #5 in Data Center Automation 8.8/10 Pricing on request · 60-day trial Free trial✓ 0 of 3 features Visit HPE OneView

Canonical MAAS leads on 1 check, HPE OneView on 0, and 0 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreCanonical MAAS · 9.3/10
  • Free planonly Canonical MAAS
  • Free trialonly HPE OneView

Canonical MAAS scores higher on our rubric for data center automation: 9.3 against 8.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #5.

Canonical MAAS offers free plan; HPE OneView doesn't.

Canonical MAAS is the better fit for teams provisioning bare-metal servers at scale. HPE OneView is the better fit for teams managing HPE compute and storage.

  • Canonical MAAS fits best

    Teams provisioning bare-metal servers at scale

  • HPE OneView fits best

    Teams managing HPE compute and storage

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Canonical MAAS 9.3/10 Visit ↗ HPE OneView 8.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.3 8.8
Ranking #1 in Data Center Automation #5 in Data Center Automation
Best for Teams provisioning bare-metal servers at scale Teams managing HPE compute and storage
Pricing model Free plan + paid Paid
Starting price $30/device/yr Pricing on request · 60-day trial
Free plan ✓ (best) —
Free trial — 60 days
Deployment Self-hosted Self-hosted, Cloud
Platforms Web, Linux Web
Support Phone, Tickets, Docs · 24/7 Phone, Live chat, Tickets, Docs
Integrations 5 integrations 10 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Canonical MAAS 0/3 · HPE OneView 0/3
Infrastructure as code Not checked yet Not checked yet
Role-based access Not checked yet Not checked yet
API access Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment options Not checked yet Not checked yet
Automation scope Not checked yet Not checked yet
Supported operating systems Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Automates discovery, OS deployment, power control, and server lifecycle tasks
  • Combines DHCP, DNS, IPAM, VLAN, and subnet management
  • REST API, CLI, and integrations with Terraform, Juju, and Ansible
  • Templates provision compute, storage, and fabric resources.
  • Tracks firmware compliance and configuration drift, with eligible remediation.
  • REST API and integrations support infrastructure automation workflows.
Cons
  • Self-hosted deployment requires teams to operate the platform
  • Paid standalone support eligibility requires Ubuntu Pro for controllers
  • Support response times and channels vary by paid tier
  • Its supported infrastructure is centered on HPE platforms.
  • The primary deployment is a virtual appliance for on-premises environments.
  • Licensing uses a contact-sales or quote-request process.
Our verdict

Canonical MAAS is an open-source platform for discovering, commissioning, deploying, and managing physical servers. It suits infrastructure teams, data-center operators, and DevOps engineers provisioning bare-metal fleets, including…

Read the review →

HPE OneView brings infrastructure management and automation together for enterprise IT teams responsible for HPE servers, storage, networking, and composable infrastructure. Its focus is a fit for mid-market and enterprise organizations…

Read the review →
  1. Canonical MAASData Center Automation 9.3Free plan
  2. HPE OneViewData Center Automation 8.8Pricing on request · 60-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Canonical MAAS — where it wins

    • Automates discovery, OS deployment, power control, and server lifecycle tasks
    • Combines DHCP, DNS, IPAM, VLAN, and subnet management
    • REST API, CLI, and integrations with Terraform, Juju, and Ansible

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosted deployment requires teams to operate the platform
    • Paid standalone support eligibility requires Ubuntu Pro for controllers
    • Support response times and channels vary by paid tier
  • HPE OneView — where it wins

    • Templates provision compute, storage, and fabric resources.
    • Tracks firmware compliance and configuration drift, with eligible remediation.
    • REST API and integrations support infrastructure automation workflows.

    Where it doesn't

    • Its supported infrastructure is centered on HPE platforms.
    • The primary deployment is a virtual appliance for on-premises environments.
    • Licensing uses a contact-sales or quote-request process.

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update