Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Static Site Generators

Bridgetown vs Astro Starlight

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score Bridgetown #5 in Static Site Generators 8.8/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Bridgetown
Astro Starlight #8 in Static Site Generators 8.5/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 4 features Try Astro Starlight

Bridgetown leads on 0 checks, Astro Starlight on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreBridgetown · 8.8/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresBridgetown · 4 of 4

Bridgetown scores higher on our rubric for static site generators: 8.8 against 8.5 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #8.

Bridgetown is the better fit for ruby developers needing flexibility. Astro Starlight is the better fit for documentation teams.

  • Bridgetown fits best

    Ruby developers needing flexibility

  • Astro Starlight fits best

    Documentation teams

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Bridgetown 8.8/10 Visit ↗ Astro Starlight 8.5/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.8 8.5
Ranking #5 in Static Site Generators #8 in Static Site Generators
Best for Ruby developers needing flexibility Documentation teams
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted Self-hosted
Platforms Windows, macOS, Linux Web
Support Community, Docs Community, Docs
Integrations 6 integrations 5 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Bridgetown 4/4 · Astro Starlight 0/4
CMS integration ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Incremental builds ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Multilingual support ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Local preview server ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Specs
Content sources Markdown Not checked yet
Supported languages Ruby, JavaScript Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Markdown, layouts, components, collections, and front matter
  • Optional SSR and dynamic routes through Roda
  • Partial rebuilds, plugins, and integrated asset processing
  • Built-in navigation, Pagefind search, SEO, and code highlighting
  • Supports Markdown, MDX, Markdoc, and internationalization
  • Works with React, Vue, Svelte, Solid, and Astro integrations
Cons
  • Hosting and infrastructure costs are separate
  • Dynamic functionality depends on adding Roda
  • Ruby-focused workflows may not suit non-Ruby teams
  • Documentation versioning uses the Starlight versions plugin
  • Projects are developed locally before deployment
  • Deployment depends on Astro-compatible hosting or rendering options
Our verdict

Bridgetown is an open-source Ruby-powered site generator and full-stack web framework for developers, agencies, and teams building content-rich websites or web applications. It turns Markdown and other resources into deployable HTML, CSS,…

Read the review →

Astro Starlight is an open-source framework for building documentation websites with Astro. It is designed for developer and technical documentation teams that prefer a docs-as-code workflow. Content can be authored in Markdown, MDX, or…

Read the review →
  1. BridgetownStatic Site Generators 8.8Free plan
  2. Astro StarlightStatic Site Generators 8.5Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Bridgetown — where it wins

    • Markdown, layouts, components, collections, and front matter
    • Optional SSR and dynamic routes through Roda
    • Partial rebuilds, plugins, and integrated asset processing

    Where it doesn't

    • Hosting and infrastructure costs are separate
    • Dynamic functionality depends on adding Roda
    • Ruby-focused workflows may not suit non-Ruby teams

  • Astro Starlight — where it wins

    • Built-in navigation, Pagefind search, SEO, and code highlighting
    • Supports Markdown, MDX, Markdoc, and internationalization
    • Works with React, Vue, Svelte, Solid, and Astro integrations

    Where it doesn't

    • Documentation versioning uses the Starlight versions plugin
    • Projects are developed locally before deployment
    • Deployment depends on Astro-compatible hosting or rendering options

More comparisons

All static site generators comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update