Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · DataOps Platforms

BMC Control-M vs Dagster

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 2 checks side by side
Higher score BMC Control-M #2 in DataOps Platforms 9.1/10 Paid ✓ 0 of 4 features Visit BMC Control-M
Dagster #8 in DataOps Platforms 8.5/10 Free plan · 30-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Dagster

BMC Control-M leads on 0 checks, Dagster on 2, and 0 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreBMC Control-M · 9.1/10
  • Lowest starting priceDagster · $10/mo
  • Free planonly Dagster
  • Free trialonly Dagster

BMC Control-M scores higher on our rubric for dataops platforms: 9.1 against 8.5 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #8.

Dagster offers free plan; BMC Control-M doesn't. Dagster is cheaper to start at $10/mo against $2,400/mo.

BMC Control-M is the better fit for enterprises orchestrating hybrid data and application jobs. Dagster is the better fit for data teams focused on assets, lineage, and quality.

  • BMC Control-M fits best

    Enterprises orchestrating hybrid data and application jobs

  • Dagster fits best

    Data teams focused on assets, lineage, and quality

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature BMC Control-M 9.1/10 Visit ↗ Dagster 8.5/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.1 8.5
Ranking #2 in DataOps Platforms #8 in DataOps Platforms
Best for Enterprises orchestrating hybrid data and application jobs Data teams focused on assets, lineage, and quality
Pricing model Paid Free plan + paid
Starting price $2,400/mo $10/mo (best)
Free plan — ✓ (best)
Free trial — 30 days
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web, iOS, Android Web
Support Email, Phone, Docs · 24/7 Community, Docs, Live chat
Compliance GDPR SOC 2, GDPR
Integrations 12 integrations 13 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features BMC Control-M 0/4 · Dagster 0/4
Workflow scheduling Not checked yet Not checked yet
Pipeline monitoring Not checked yet Not checked yet
Data quality checks Not checked yet Not checked yet
Version control Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment options Not checked yet Not checked yet
Supported integrations Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Orchestrates application and data workflows across cloud and on-premises environments
  • Combines SLA monitoring, predictive delay detection, and managed file transfer
  • Connects with AWS, Azure, Snowflake, Databricks, SAP, and Apache Airflow
  • Tracks asset dependencies and lineage with freshness and quality checks
  • Supports schedules, event-driven sensors, retries, partitions, and backfills
  • Integrates with dbt, Snowflake, Fivetran, Spark, and Databricks
Cons
  • No free plan; Starter Pack starts at $2,400 per month with annual billing
  • Starter Pack execution volume is capped
  • The published entry price may not suit smaller teams or narrower workloads
  • Solo is limited to 1 user, 1 code location, and 1 deployment
  • Starter costs $100/month and supports up to 3 users
  • Pro requires a sales conversation, and usage-based charges can apply
Our verdict

BMC Control-M is workflow orchestration software for enterprise IT, operations, development, and data teams managing processes across cloud, on-premises, hybrid, distributed, and mainframe environments. Visual workflow design and…

Read the review →

Dagster is a data orchestration framework and platform for data engineering teams building analytics, machine learning, AI, ingestion, and transformation workflows. Its asset-based model connects dependencies, lineage, metadata, execution,…

Read the review →
  1. BMC Control-MDataOps Platforms 9.1Paid
  2. DagsterDataOps Platforms 8.5Free plan · 30-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • BMC Control-M — where it wins

    • Orchestrates application and data workflows across cloud and on-premises environments
    • Combines SLA monitoring, predictive delay detection, and managed file transfer
    • Connects with AWS, Azure, Snowflake, Databricks, SAP, and Apache Airflow

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan; Starter Pack starts at $2,400 per month with annual billing
    • Starter Pack execution volume is capped
    • The published entry price may not suit smaller teams or narrower workloads
  • Dagster — where it wins

    • Tracks asset dependencies and lineage with freshness and quality checks
    • Supports schedules, event-driven sensors, retries, partitions, and backfills
    • Integrates with dbt, Snowflake, Fivetran, Spark, and Databricks

    Where it doesn't

    • Solo is limited to 1 user, 1 code location, and 1 deployment
    • Starter costs $100/month and supports up to 3 users
    • Pro requires a sales conversation, and usage-based charges can apply
  • BMC Control-M9.1/10 · Paid

    Coordinates application and data workflows across cloud, on-premises, hybrid, and mainframe environments.

    Visit BMC Control-MFull verdict →
  • Dagster8.5/10 · Free plan · 30-day trial

    A flexible orchestration platform for teams managing data assets and production pipelines.

    Visit DagsterFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update