Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Interactive Application Security Testing Software

Black Duck Seeker vs Contrast Assess

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 2 checks side by side
Higher score Black Duck Seeker #4 in Interactive Application Security Testing Software 8.8/10 Pricing on request ✓ 2 of 3 features Visit Black Duck
Contrast Assess #5 in Interactive Application Security Testing Software 8.7/10 Pricing on request ✓ 2 of 3 features Try Contrast Assess

Black Duck Seeker leads on 0 checks, Contrast Assess on 0, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreBlack Duck Seeker · 8.8/10

Black Duck Seeker scores higher on our rubric for interactive application security testing software: 8.8 against 8.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #5.

On deployment, Contrast Assess gives you Hybrid where Black Duck Seeker offers Self-hosted.

Black Duck Seeker is the better fit for broad enterprise IAST deployments. Contrast Assess is the better fit for mature teams needing runtime visibility.

  • Black Duck Seeker fits best

    Broad enterprise IAST deployments

  • Contrast Assess fits best

    Mature teams needing runtime visibility

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Black Duck Seeker 8.8/10 Visit ↗ Contrast Assess 8.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.8 8.7
Ranking #4 in Interactive Application Security Testing Software #5 in Interactive Application Security Testing Software
Best for Broad enterprise IAST deployments Mature teams needing runtime visibility
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request Pricing on request
Free plan Not checked yet Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web, Windows, macOS, Linux Web
Support Email, Phone, Tickets, Community, Docs Docs
Compliance GDPR, PCI DSS SOC 2, GDPR, SSO/SAML
Integrations 15 integrations 2 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Black Duck Seeker 2/3 · Contrast Assess 2/3
Authenticated testing Not checked yet Not checked yet
API testing ✓ ✓
CI/CD integration ✓ ✓
Specs
Runtime targets Web Not checked yet
Deployment Self-hosted Hybrid
Instrumentation Agent Agent
Language coverage Java, .NET, Node.js, Go, Python, PHP Java, Kotlin, Scala, .NET Framework, .NET Core, C#, VB.NET, Node.js, Python, Go, PHP
Our review
Pros
  • Active vulnerability verification adds exploitability context.
  • API analysis covers REST, SOAP, GraphQL, and gRPC.
  • Extensive CI/CD, cloud, and compliance integrations.
  • Continuous runtime analysis with agent-based instrumentation
  • Route coverage, data-flow maps, and remediation guidance
  • API testing and CI/CD workflow support
Cons
  • Enterprise Server deployment requires a self-hosted environment.
  • Quote-based pricing adds a sales step to procurement.
  • Its breadth may exceed the needs of narrowly focused teams.
  • Pricing and licensing require a sales conversation
  • Listed integrations focus on Visual Studio and GitHub
  • Platform coverage is narrower than some alternatives
Our verdict

Black Duck Seeker is an interactive application security testing platform for development, QA, DevOps, and security teams. It instruments running applications through technology-specific agents during manual or automated testing, then…

Read the review →

Contrast Assess is an interactive application security testing tool for development, test, QA, and staging environments. It uses agent-based instrumentation and sensors to analyze running web applications and APIs. Its coverage spans…

Read the review →
  1. Black Duck SeekerInteractive Application Security Testing Software 8.8Pricing on request
  2. Contrast AssessInteractive Application Security Testing Software 8.7Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Black Duck Seeker — where it wins

    • Active vulnerability verification adds exploitability context.
    • API analysis covers REST, SOAP, GraphQL, and gRPC.
    • Extensive CI/CD, cloud, and compliance integrations.

    Where it doesn't

    • Enterprise Server deployment requires a self-hosted environment.
    • Quote-based pricing adds a sales step to procurement.
    • Its breadth may exceed the needs of narrowly focused teams.

  • Contrast Assess — where it wins

    • Continuous runtime analysis with agent-based instrumentation
    • Route coverage, data-flow maps, and remediation guidance
    • API testing and CI/CD workflow support

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing and licensing require a sales conversation
    • Listed integrations focus on Visual Studio and GitHub
    • Platform coverage is narrower than some alternatives

More comparisons

All interactive application security testing software comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update