This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them

Period

–Visits

–Page views

–Clicks to vendors

–Time on page

–Reading now

Clicks to vendors, by tool

Top countries

Devices

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Static Application Security Testing Software

Black Duck Coverity vs PVS-Studio

Updated Oct 2026
Both researched from official sources
4 checks side by side

Higher score Black Duck Coverity #4 in Static Application Security Testing Software 8.5/10 Pricing on request ✓ 3 of 4 features Visit Black Duck

PVS-Studio #8 in Static Application Security Testing Software 8.0/10 Pricing on request · 7-day trial Free trial✓ 1 of 4 features Visit PVS-Studio

Black Duck Coverity leads on 0 checks, PVS-Studio on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

Highest scoreBlack Duck Coverity · 8.5/10
Free trialonly PVS-Studio
Most featuresBlack Duck Coverity · 3 of 4

Black Duck Coverity scores higher on our rubric for static application security testing software: 8.5 against 8.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #8.

Black Duck Coverity is the better fit for organizations needing mature hybrid code analysis. PVS-Studio is the better fit for multilanguage teams needing strong IDE coverage.

Black Duck Coverity fits best
Organizations needing mature hybrid code analysis
PVS-Studio fits best
Multilanguage teams needing strong IDE coverage

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Show only differences

Feature	Black Duck Coverity 8.5/10 Visit ↗	PVS-Studio 8.0/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	8.5	8.0
Ranking	#4 in Static Application Security Testing Software	#8 in Static Application Security Testing Software
Best for	Organizations needing mature hybrid code analysis	Multilanguage teams needing strong IDE coverage
Pricing model	Paid	Paid
Starting price	Pricing on request	—
Free plan	Not checked yet	—
Free trial	—	7 days
Deployment	Self-hosted	Self-hosted, Desktop
Platforms	Web, Windows, macOS, Linux	Windows, macOS, Linux
Support	Community, Docs	Email, Docs
Integrations	3 integrations	20 integrations
Built for	Mid-market, Enterprise	Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Black Duck Coverity 3/4 · PVS-Studio 1/4
IDE support	✓	✓
CI/CD support	✓ (best)	Not checked yet
SCA included	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Fix guidance	✓ (best)	Not checked yet
Specs
Analysis target	Source	Not checked yet
Supported languages	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Deployment	Self-hosted	Not checked yet
Our review
Pros	Analyzes source code for security and code-quality defects without execution Supports compliance reporting for OWASP, CWE, MISRA, CERT, and PCI DSS Connects IDE, pull-request, commit, and CI/CD scanning workflows	Analyzes seven languages with CWE and OWASP ASVS mappings Integrates with major IDEs, CI/CD tools, and pull-request workflows Supports browser-based review, assignments, status marking, and team reports
Cons	Contact-sales pricing makes plan-by-plan comparison less direct Software composition analysis is not included Its enterprise scope may exceed narrower application-security needs	Pricing uses a contact-sales model There is no free plan beyond the seven-day trial Users cannot create their own analyzer rules
Our verdict	Black Duck Coverity is an enterprise static application security testing solution for development and security teams working on complex, regulated, safety-critical, embedded, and enterprise software. It analyzes source code without… Read the review →	PVS-Studio is a static analyzer for development teams that checks source code for defects, potential vulnerabilities, coding-standard violations, and optimization issues. It supports C, C++, C#, Java, JavaScript, TypeScript, and Go across… Read the review →

Black Duck CoverityStatic Application Security Testing Software 8.5Pricing on request
PVS-StudioStatic Application Security Testing Software 8.0Pricing on request · 7-day trial

Compare the top tools in

Strengths and trade-offs

Black Duck Coverity — where it wins
- Analyzes source code for security and code-quality defects without execution
- Supports compliance reporting for OWASP, CWE, MISRA, CERT, and PCI DSS
- Connects IDE, pull-request, commit, and CI/CD scanning workflows
Where it doesn't
- Contact-sales pricing makes plan-by-plan comparison less direct
- Software composition analysis is not included
- Its enterprise scope may exceed narrower application-security needs
PVS-Studio — where it wins
- Analyzes seven languages with CWE and OWASP ASVS mappings
- Integrates with major IDEs, CI/CD tools, and pull-request workflows
- Supports browser-based review, assignments, status marking, and team reports
Where it doesn't
- Pricing uses a contact-sales model
- There is no free plan beyond the seven-day trial
- Users cannot create their own analyzer rules

Black Duck Coverity8.5/10 · Pricing on request
A broad hybrid code-analysis platform for security, quality, compliance, and delivery workflows.
Visit Black Duck Full verdict →
PVS-Studio8.0/10 · Pricing on request · 7-day trial
A broad static analyzer for multilanguage teams with strong IDE and CI/CD coverage.
Visit PVS-Studio Full verdict →

More comparisons

All static application security testing software comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated 7 Oct 2026 · How we research and update