Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Backup and Disaster Recovery Software

Azure Site Recovery vs Quest Rapid Recovery

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Higher score Azure Site Recovery #7 in Backup and Disaster Recovery Software 8.7/10 31-day trial Free trial✓ 0 of 3 features Visit Microsoft
Quest Rapid Recovery #8 in Backup and Disaster Recovery Software 8.6/10 Pricing on request · 14-day trial Free trial✓ 0 of 3 features Visit Quest

Azure Site Recovery leads on 0 checks, Quest Rapid Recovery on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreAzure Site Recovery · 8.7/10
  • Free trialboth

Azure Site Recovery scores higher on our rubric for backup and disaster recovery software: 8.7 against 8.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #7 and #8.

Azure Site Recovery is the better fit for azure and VMware failover orchestration. Quest Rapid Recovery is the better fit for verified recovery for physical and virtual systems.

  • Azure Site Recovery fits best

    Azure and VMware failover orchestration

  • Quest Rapid Recovery fits best

    Verified recovery for physical and virtual systems

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Azure Site Recovery 8.7/10 Visit ↗ Quest Rapid Recovery 8.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.7 8.6
Ranking #7 in Backup and Disaster Recovery Software #8 in Backup and Disaster Recovery Software
Best for Azure and VMware failover orchestration Verified recovery for physical and virtual systems
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price — Pricing on request · 14-day trial
Free plan — —
Free trial 31 days 14 days
Free trial length 31 days 14 days
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web, Windows, Linux
Support Tickets, Email, Phone, Live chat, Community, Docs Docs, Tickets
Compliance ISO 27001 GDPR, SSO/SAML, 2FA
Integrations 8 integrations 16 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Azure Site Recovery 0/3 · Quest Rapid Recovery 0/3
Immutable backups Not checked yet Not checked yet
Recovery orchestration Not checked yet Not checked yet
Ransomware recovery Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment model Hybrid Not checked yet
Protected workloads Not checked yet Not checked yet
Maximum retention Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Sequenced recovery plans support multi-tier application failover.
  • Continuous replication covers Azure, VMware, Hyper-V, and physical workloads.
  • Test failover, failback, and runbook integration support recovery drills.
  • Application-aware snapshots at intervals as short as five minutes
  • Recovery from individual files through full physical and virtual machines
  • Verified Recovery, replication, standby, and cloud archiving in one product
Cons
  • Post-trial pricing is shown as $-/month per protected instance.
  • Storage, transactions, data transfer, and compute may add charges.
  • The service is available through the web platform only.
  • Licensing requires contacting Quest sales
  • There is no free plan
  • The 14-day trial stops taking snapshots after expiry
Our verdict

Azure Site Recovery is a managed disaster recovery service for organizations protecting Azure, VMware, Hyper-V, physical, Azure Stack, and AWS Windows workloads. It supports replication between Azure regions, from on-premises environments…

Read the review →

Quest Rapid Recovery is backup, replication, and disaster-recovery software for organizations protecting physical servers, virtual machines, applications, and cloud workloads. Its hybrid deployment supports web, Windows, Linux, and API…

Read the review →
  1. Azure Site RecoveryBackup and Disaster Recovery Software 8.731-day trial
  2. Quest Rapid RecoveryBackup and Disaster Recovery Software 8.6Pricing on request · 14-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Azure Site Recovery — where it wins

    • Sequenced recovery plans support multi-tier application failover.
    • Continuous replication covers Azure, VMware, Hyper-V, and physical workloads.
    • Test failover, failback, and runbook integration support recovery drills.

    Where it doesn't

    • Post-trial pricing is shown as $-/month per protected instance.
    • Storage, transactions, data transfer, and compute may add charges.
    • The service is available through the web platform only.
  • Quest Rapid Recovery — where it wins

    • Application-aware snapshots at intervals as short as five minutes
    • Recovery from individual files through full physical and virtual machines
    • Verified Recovery, replication, standby, and cloud archiving in one product

    Where it doesn't

    • Licensing requires contacting Quest sales
    • There is no free plan
    • The 14-day trial stops taking snapshots after expiry
  • Azure Site Recovery8.7/10 · 31-day trial

    A broad disaster recovery service for Azure, VMware, and hybrid failover orchestration.

    Visit MicrosoftFull verdict →
  • Quest Rapid Recovery8.6/10 · Pricing on request · 14-day trial

    A broad hybrid recovery platform with verified recovery and sales-led pricing.

    Visit QuestFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update