Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Code Signing Software

Azure Artifact Signing vs SSL.com eSigner for Code

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score Azure Artifact Signing #7 in Code Signing Software 8.5/10 Paid ✓ 5 of 6 features Visit Microsoft
SSL.com eSigner for Code #10 in Code Signing Software 8.2/10 30-day trial Free trial✓ 5 of 6 features Visit SSL.com

Azure Artifact Signing leads on 0 checks, SSL.com eSigner for Code on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreAzure Artifact Signing · 8.5/10
  • Free trialonly SSL.com eSigner for Code

Azure Artifact Signing scores higher on our rubric for code signing software: 8.5 against 8.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #7 and #10.

Azure Artifact Signing is the better fit for microsoft-centric teams needing managed signing. SSL.com eSigner for Code is the better fit for teams buying certificates with cloud HSM signing.

  • Azure Artifact Signing fits best

    Microsoft-centric teams needing managed signing

  • SSL.com eSigner for Code fits best

    Teams buying certificates with cloud HSM signing

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Azure Artifact Signing 8.5/10 Visit ↗ SSL.com eSigner for Code 8.2/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.5 8.2
Ranking #7 in Code Signing Software #10 in Code Signing Software
Best for Microsoft-centric teams needing managed signing Teams buying certificates with cloud HSM signing
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price $9.99/mo —
Free plan — —
Free trial — 30 days
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Desktop
Platforms Web, Windows, Linux Web, Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Tickets, Community, Docs Email, Live chat, Docs
Integrations 8 integrations 8 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Azure Artifact Signing 5/6 · SSL.com eSigner for Code 5/6
Certificate provided ✓ ✓
Cloud signing ✓ ✓
HSM key protection ✓ ✓
Trusted timestamping ✓ ✓
CI/CD signing ✓ ✓
Approval workflows Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Supported targets Win32 applications, PE binaries, VBS enclaves, CI policy files, internal/private artifacts, containers, and SignTool-supported file types Windows executables, drivers, installers, scripts, .exe, .dll, .msi, .cab, .sys, .ps1, Java code objects
Our review
Pros
  • FIPS 140-3 Level 3 hardware-protected signing keys
  • Integrations with SignTool, GitHub Actions, and Azure DevOps
  • Public and private signing with trusted timestamping
  • Cloud HSM-backed private-key storage with OTP/TOTP protection
  • CI/CD support for GitHub Actions, Jenkins, Azure DevOps, and more
  • Batch signing, malware scanning, timestamping, APIs, and headless signing
Cons
  • No free plan
  • Premium costs $99.99 per account monthly
  • Target coverage is narrower than broader code-signing platforms
  • The certificate and eSigner subscription are separate purchases
  • Governance features are narrower than some higher-tier alternatives
  • There is no free plan; the trial lasts 30 days
Our verdict

Azure Artifact Signing is Microsoft’s managed cloud service for signing applications and software artifacts. It is designed for developers and organizations distributing Win32 applications, PE binaries, VBS enclaves, CI policy files,…

Read the review →

SSL.com eSigner for Code is a cloud-based code-signing service for developers, DevOps teams, and organizations distributing software. It stores signing keys in SSL.com’s cloud HSM and supports Windows executables, drivers, installers,…

Read the review →
  1. Azure Artifact SigningCode Signing Software 8.5Paid
  2. SSL.com eSigner for CodeCode Signing Software 8.230-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Azure Artifact Signing — where it wins

    • FIPS 140-3 Level 3 hardware-protected signing keys
    • Integrations with SignTool, GitHub Actions, and Azure DevOps
    • Public and private signing with trusted timestamping

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan
    • Premium costs $99.99 per account monthly
    • Target coverage is narrower than broader code-signing platforms

  • SSL.com eSigner for Code — where it wins

    • Cloud HSM-backed private-key storage with OTP/TOTP protection
    • CI/CD support for GitHub Actions, Jenkins, Azure DevOps, and more
    • Batch signing, malware scanning, timestamping, APIs, and headless signing

    Where it doesn't

    • The certificate and eSigner subscription are separate purchases
    • Governance features are narrower than some higher-tier alternatives
    • There is no free plan; the trial lasts 30 days
  • Azure Artifact Signing8.5/10 · Paid

    A managed signing service for Microsoft-focused teams, with Basic and Premium plans.

    Visit MicrosoftFull verdict →
  • SSL.com eSigner for Code8.2/10 · 30-day trial

    A cloud HSM signing service with strong CI/CD coverage and separate certificate costs.

    Visit SSL.comFull verdict →

More comparisons

All code signing software comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update