Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Internal Developer Platforms

Atlassian Compass vs Backstage

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score Atlassian Compass #2 in Internal Developer Platforms 9.2/10 Free plan · 14-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 1 of 6 features Visit Atlassian
Backstage #5 in Internal Developer Platforms 8.9/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 2 of 6 features Visit Backstage

Atlassian Compass leads on 0 checks, Backstage on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreAtlassian Compass · 9.2/10
  • Free planboth
  • Free trialonly Atlassian Compass
  • Most featuresBackstage · 2 of 6

Atlassian Compass scores higher on our rubric for internal developer platforms: 9.2 against 8.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #5.

Atlassian Compass is the better fit for teams standardizing component ownership and health. Backstage is the better fit for teams that can operate and customize an open-source portal.

  • Atlassian Compass fits best

    Teams standardizing component ownership and health

  • Backstage fits best

    Teams that can operate and customize an open-source portal

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Atlassian Compass 9.2/10 Visit ↗ Backstage 8.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.2 8.9
Ranking #2 in Internal Developer Platforms #5 in Internal Developer Platforms
Best for Teams standardizing component ownership and health Teams that can operate and customize an open-source portal
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free
Starting price $7.67/user/mo Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial 14 days —
Deployment Cloud Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Support Community, Docs · 24/7 Community, Docs
Integrations 12 integrations 5 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Atlassian Compass 1/6 · Backstage 2/6
Service catalog Not checked yet Not checked yet
Software templates Not checked yet Not checked yet
Engineering scorecards ✓ ✓
Kubernetes support Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Role-based access Not checked yet Not checked yet
Audit logs Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Catalogs unlimited software services on the Free plan
  • Maps dependencies and links components to owners, teams, and repositories
  • Connects health scorecards with deployment, activity, and incident context
  • Catalogs services, APIs, libraries, infrastructure, and ownership metadata.
  • Templates standardize component creation and publish projects to repositories.
  • TechDocs, Kubernetes visibility, permissions, and plugins cover varied portal needs.
Cons
  • Free includes only 3 custom fields and scorecards
  • Standard support is limited to 9/5 regional coverage
  • Compass catalog and scorecard functionality is set to transition into the DX app
  • Self-hosting leaves portal operation to the adopting team.
  • Customization through plugins can require ongoing engineering effort.
  • Support channels are community and documentation.
Our verdict

Atlassian Compass gives engineering organizations a cloud portal for cataloging software components, services, libraries, applications, and teams. Its searchable catalog records ownership, documentation, repositories, and dependencies,…

Read the review →

Backstage is an open-source framework for building an internal developer portal, aimed at developers, platform engineers, and engineering managers who need a shared view of software and ownership. Its searchable catalog covers services,…

Read the review →
  1. Atlassian CompassInternal Developer Platforms 9.2Free plan · 14-day trial
  2. BackstageInternal Developer Platforms 8.9Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Atlassian Compass — where it wins

    • Catalogs unlimited software services on the Free plan
    • Maps dependencies and links components to owners, teams, and repositories
    • Connects health scorecards with deployment, activity, and incident context

    Where it doesn't

    • Free includes only 3 custom fields and scorecards
    • Standard support is limited to 9/5 regional coverage
    • Compass catalog and scorecard functionality is set to transition into the DX app
  • Backstage — where it wins

    • Catalogs services, APIs, libraries, infrastructure, and ownership metadata.
    • Templates standardize component creation and publish projects to repositories.
    • TechDocs, Kubernetes visibility, permissions, and plugins cover varied portal needs.

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosting leaves portal operation to the adopting team.
    • Customization through plugins can require ongoing engineering effort.
    • Support channels are community and documentation.
  • Atlassian Compass9.2/10 · Free plan · 14-day trial

    A searchable component catalog with ownership, health scorecards, and operational context.

    Visit AtlassianFull verdict →
  • Backstage8.9/10 · Free plan

    A customizable developer portal framework for teams prepared to self-host and extend it.

    Visit BackstageFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update