Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Metaverse Workplace Software

Arthur vs Glue

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score Arthur #1 in Metaverse Workplace Software 8.9/10 Free plan · pricing on request Free plan✓ 2 of 4 features Visit Arthur
Glue #3 in Metaverse Workplace Software 8.3/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 2 of 4 features Visit Glue

Arthur leads on 0 checks, Glue on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreArthur · 8.9/10
  • Free planboth

Arthur scores higher on our rubric for metaverse workplace software: 8.9 against 8.3 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #3.

Arthur is the better fit for teams needing persistent rooms and enterprise controls. Glue is the better fit for teams prioritizing 3D spaces and broad integrations.

  • Arthur fits best

    Teams needing persistent rooms and enterprise controls

  • Glue fits best

    Teams prioritizing 3D spaces and broad integrations

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Arthur 8.9/10 Visit ↗ Glue 8.3/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.9 8.3
Ranking #1 in Metaverse Workplace Software #3 in Metaverse Workplace Software
Best for Teams needing persistent rooms and enterprise controls Teams prioritizing 3D spaces and broad integrations
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price Free plan · pricing on request €50/user/mo
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Desktop
Platforms Web Web, Windows, macOS
Support Email Tickets, Docs
Integrations 5 integrations 100+ integrations
Built for Small business, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Arthur 2/4 · Glue 2/4
VR headset support Not checked yet Not checked yet
Spatial audio ✓ ✓
Customisable spaces Not checked yet Not checked yet
Screen sharing ✓ ✓
Specs
Access methods Not checked yet Not checked yet
Meeting capacity Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Persistent rooms are accessible without a host, including via the web.
  • Spatial and private audio zones support breakout discussions.
  • Offers Microsoft Teams, Jira, Miro, and SharePoint integrations.
  • Persistent spaces keep team content beyond live meetings.
  • Spatial audio, avatars, whiteboards and shared presentations support collaboration.
  • Web, Windows and macOS access plus integrations including Slack and Zoom.
Cons
  • Sales are demo-based, with pricing handled through contact sales.
  • Access controls are categorized as open.
  • Its immersive 3D workspace may be more than teams need for routine meetings.
  • Professional costs €50 per user monthly with annual billing.
  • Desktop screen sharing is available, but browser-only sessions are an Enterprise feature.
  • Its avatar-based 3D approach may not suit teams seeking conventional video meetings.
Our verdict

Arthur provides immersive 3D workspaces for meetings, workshops, training, presentations, and onboarding. Persistent rooms can be accessed without a host, and web access gives teams a way to join without relying only on XR devices.…

Read the review →

Glue brings distributed teams together in persistent 3D spaces, where participants meet as avatars and communicate with spatial audio. Whiteboards, sticky notes, presentations, shared files, imported 3D models and desktop screen sharing…

Read the review →
  1. ArthurMetaverse Workplace Software 8.9Free plan · pricing on request
  2. GlueMetaverse Workplace Software 8.3Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Arthur — where it wins

    • Persistent rooms are accessible without a host, including via the web.
    • Spatial and private audio zones support breakout discussions.
    • Offers Microsoft Teams, Jira, Miro, and SharePoint integrations.

    Where it doesn't

    • Sales are demo-based, with pricing handled through contact sales.
    • Access controls are categorized as open.
    • Its immersive 3D workspace may be more than teams need for routine meetings.

  • Glue — where it wins

    • Persistent spaces keep team content beyond live meetings.
    • Spatial audio, avatars, whiteboards and shared presentations support collaboration.
    • Web, Windows and macOS access plus integrations including Slack and Zoom.

    Where it doesn't

    • Professional costs €50 per user monthly with annual billing.
    • Desktop screen sharing is available, but browser-only sessions are an Enterprise feature.
    • Its avatar-based 3D approach may not suit teams seeking conventional video meetings.
  • Arthur8.9/10 · Free plan · pricing on request

    Arthur pairs persistent web-accessible rooms with spatial collaboration and enterprise deployment options.

    Visit ArthurFull verdict →
  • Glue8.3/10 · Free plan

    Glue pairs persistent 3D team spaces with spatial audio and collaborative tools.

    Visit GlueFull verdict →

More comparisons

All metaverse workplace software comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update